10 Best iSpring Alternatives in 2025 for Creating Engaging Quizzes

I’ve worked with iSpring QuizMaker enough to see both its strengths and its limits. It handles structured assessments well, but the high cost, restricted free plan, lack of Mac support, and static quiz formats often leave users looking elsewhere. That’s why so many are now exploring iSpring alternatives.

The best iSpring QuizMaker alternatives don’t just fill those gaps—they make quiz creation faster with AI, provide deeper reporting, and add interactive formats that work just as well in classrooms as in corporate training.

In this guide, I’ll share 10 options that stand out and where each one can make a real difference.

Why Look Beyond iSpring QuizMaker

iSpring QuizMaker is widely used for e-learning and training, but several challenges make educators and trainers search for better-suited alternatives:

• Expensive Licensing: Aside from a very limited free version, getting full functionality in iSpring requires a paid subscription, which is a barrier for many classrooms and small organizations.
• Limited Free Tool: The free edition of iSpring supports only three basic question types. Advanced features like drag-and-drop or hotspot questions, extensive question banks, and detailed feedback require the paid version.
• Platform Restrictions: iSpring works as a PowerPoint add-in on Windows. There’s no standalone web app or Mac support, which can be inconvenient for teams using diverse devices.
• No Live or Gamified Options: iSpring creates static quizzes for asynchronous use. It doesn’t have built-in features for live quizzes, student-paced games, or team play, so engagement can dip compared to more interactive platforms.
• Basic Analytics: While you can get quiz reports via email or LMS, iSpring lacks the kind of real-time dashboards and deep analytics some alternatives provide for tracking learner performance over time.
• Integration and Sharing Limits: Beyond publishing quizzes to LMS or the web, iSpring has fewer direct integrations with classroom or corporate tools (e.g., Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams) and no large community library of pre-made quizzes.

Best iSpring Alternatives for Quizzes & Assessments

Here’s a look at some of the strongest iSpring QuizMaker alternatives available today. Each takes a different approach—secure exam delivery, gamified learning, AI-generated questions, or collaborative classroom quizzing—so you can see how they compare and which might fit best for you.

iSpring Alternatives at a Glance

1. ProProfs Quiz Maker — Best for AI-Powered Quizzes & Secure Assessments

I’ve used ProProfs Quiz Maker in all kinds of training scenarios—from onboarding new hires to checking product knowledge, running compliance tests, and keeping teams sharp with periodic refreshers. 

What I like is that it saves time without cutting corners. The AI quiz generator can spin up a ready-to-use test in seconds, but when I need something more in-depth, there’s a massive library of 100,000+ templates, 200+ skill assessments, and over a million questions to build from.

The tool supports 20+ interactive formats, like drag-and-drop, hotspots, audio, and video, so quizzes don’t feel repetitive. Instant grading and feedback remove manual work, and the detailed reports make it easy to track performance across individuals, groups, or classes. For me, it’s just as reliable for quick quizzes as it is for running secure, large-scale exams.

Pros:

• AI quiz generator creates quizzes from PDFs, docs, videos, or prompts.
• 100,000+ templates and a million ready-to-use questions for instant content.
• Supports 20+ question types, including advanced formats like drag-and-drop, hotspot, and audio/video.
• Detailed reports and analytics to track performance at class, group, or individual levels.
• Enterprise-ready: randomization, browser lockdown, automated proctoring, and anti-cheating settings.

Cons:

• Dark mode is missing, which can affect comfort during extended use.
• Fully cloud-based, without a downloadable or on-premise version for offline deployment.

How ProProfs Quiz Maker Compares to iSpring:

iSpring is a strong quiz authoring tool, but it lacks some of the flexibility ProProfs provides. ProProfs Quiz Maker offers features like AI-based quiz creation and built-in proctoring that iSpring doesn’t have. It’s also fully web-based (no PowerPoint needed) and includes more question formats and ready-made content, making it a more versatile choice for quick creation and secure testing.

Pricing:

Free for short quizzes with all essential features. Paid plans start at $19.99/month for longer assessments and advanced security.

User Rating: 4.4/5 (G2)

2. ClassMarker — Best for Professional Exam Delivery

Image source: ClassMarker’s Facebook page

ClassMarker is one of the iSpring alternatives I recommend most when exams need to be taken seriously. It’s used by schools, universities, and organizations that want professional-level testing with strong delivery controls. Creating a test is straightforward—you can build from scratch or draw on question banks, set timers, and randomize questions to keep each attempt unique.

The biggest strength is its focus on exam security. You can lock down browsers, block copy-paste, detect tab switching, and even require ID verification for access. These measures make online testing feel closer to sitting in a supervised exam hall. 

On the reporting side, ClassMarker provides detailed analytics at the individual, group, and organizational level, with exports and integrations for sharing results or syncing with your LMS.

Pros:

• Secure testing with browser lockdown, tab monitoring, and ID verification.
• Automated grading and detailed performance reports with export options.
• Wide range of question formats, including multimedia and file uploads.
• API and LMS integrations for scaling to large organizations.

Cons:

• Limited customization for branding and test appearance.
• Lacks collaborative or team-based quiz modes.

How ClassMarker Compares to iSpring:

iSpring QuizMaker is strong for authoring quizzes, but doesn’t emphasize secure delivery. ClassMarker is purpose-built for professional exam integrity, making it better suited for compliance tests, certifications, and corporate training where security and reliability come first.

Pricing: 

Not-for-profit plans start at $19.95/month. Business plans start at $39.95/month.

User Rating: 4.4/5 (G2)

3. Wayground (Formerly Quizizz) — Best for Student-Paced Learning and Homework Quizzes

Image source: Wayground

I came across Wayground back when it was still called Quizizz, and what immediately struck me was how it allows learners to work at their own pace. That flexibility makes it less stressful for classrooms where students learn at different speeds.

Digging deeper, I found the content library to be incredibly broad, with millions of quizzes already created by educators. You can either build new ones from scratch or adapt existing sets across every grade level and subject. The platform supports multiple question formats—like multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, polls, and open-ended responses—which helps keep activities varied.

Whether used live or assigned as homework, the reporting dashboard provides detailed, question-level insights that go beyond just scores, making it a strong option for both engagement and progress tracking.

Pros:

• Self-paced mode that reduces pressure on learners.
• Millions of ready-to-use, teacher-created quizzes across subjects.
• Supports multiple interactive question formats.
• Works for both live games and asynchronous homework.
• Reporting includes question-level insights and performance trends.

Cons:

• Some advanced features and participant limits require a paid plan.
• The interface can feel crowded for first-time users.

How Wayground Compares to iSpring:

Wayground provides more detailed classroom reporting and a huge library of pre-made quizzes. In contexts where engagement and ongoing formative assessment matter, Wayground offers flexibility and insight that iSpring’s one-quiz-at-a-time model doesn’t easily match.

Pricing:

Wayground offers a free plan with access to basic features. Paid plans for schools and districts are available upon request. For businesses, pricing starts at $75.

User Rating: 4.9/5 (G2)

4. FlexiQuiz — Best for Monitored Online Exams

Image source: FlexiQuiz

FlexiQuiz is a versatile iSpring alternative for creating, delivering, and monitoring online quizzes in both academic and corporate settings. It supports a broad range of question types, including multiple choice, essays, file uploads, and matching, giving flexibility for everything from short knowledge checks to formal exams. 

You can also add timers, set question randomization, and build multi-page tests with branching logic for more personalized assessments.

What makes the platform practical is how it combines test creation with delivery controls. Password protection, private test links, and browser security help maintain integrity, while live invigilation features let proctors monitor participants in real time. 

When I tried running a mock quiz, the instant reports were detailed and exportable, which made it easy to analyze responses and share results. FlexiQuiz also integrates with platforms like Moodle, WordPress, and Zapier, so it fits into existing workflows without much setup.

Pros:

• Supports 20+ question types, including essays and file uploads.
• Security features such as password protection, randomization, and browser lockdown.
• Real-time invigilation for monitoring high-stakes exams.
• Customizable branding and certificates for professional use.

Cons:

• File upload responses can increase grading time compared to auto-marked questions.
• Bulk user management requires extra steps, which slows down setup for large cohorts.

How FlexiQuiz Compares to iSpring:

iSpring QuizMaker focuses on authoring but doesn’t offer built-in proctoring or live monitoring. FlexiQuiz provides those features out of the box, making it better suited for secure assessments where oversight is as important as content.

Pricing: Starts at $17/month for 500 responses a month.

User Rating: 4.3/5 (Capterra)

5. Blooket — Best for Game-Based Practice Sessions

Image source: Blooket

Blooket takes a playful approach to quizzes by turning question sets into different game styles. The same content can be used in modes like Gold Quest, Tower Defense, or Café, each offering its own unique rules and mechanics. This variety keeps sessions fresh and helps prevent the experience from feeling repetitive.

Getting started is quick—students just enter a code to join, either on their own or as part of a team. The gameplay often involves collecting, trading, or managing resources, which adds excitement to what might otherwise feel like another review exercise.

While Blooket doesn’t focus on detailed reporting or formal testing, it shines as a tool for making classroom practice more interactive and fun.

Pros:

• Wide selection of game modes built around quiz content.
• Straightforward setup and quick student access with join codes.
• Supports both live play and homework assignments.
• Works especially well for younger learners.

Cons:

• Some modes rely on chance, which can reduce focus on content.
• Reports provide only basic results.
• The novelty can decline if used too frequently.

How Blooket Compares to iSpring:

iSpring delivers traditional quizzes and exams, whereas Blooket turns quiz questions into a variety of games. This makes Blooket far more engaging for practice and review sessions, though it’s not designed for serious assessment. In other words, Blooket can breathe fun into content review in ways iSpring cannot.

Pricing:

Blooket offers a free plan with all core game modes. The Blooket Plus plan ($4.99/month) adds enhanced reporting and additional customization options.

User Rating: 4.9/5 (G2)

6. Exam.net — Best for High-Security Academic Testing

Image source: Exam.net

Exam.net is one of the most trusted tools I’ve seen in schools and universities where test integrity is critical. Setting up exams is straightforward: you can create them directly in the platform or upload existing PDFs, and students join with a secure code—no accounts or complex onboarding required.

Its real strength lies in exam security. The lockdown mode prevents tab switching, blocks internet searches, and flags suspicious behavior, while teachers can monitor live dashboards to see student activity in real time. 

I also like how this iSpring alternative caters to subject-specific needs with features such as equation editors for math, dictionaries for language tests, and text-to-speech for accessibility. These built-in tools make it practical for a wide range of academic and professional assessments.

Pros:

• Lockdown browser with tab-switch detection and real-time alerts.
• Subject-friendly tools including equation editors, dictionaries, and text-to-speech.
• Simple student access with unique exam codes, no logins needed.
• Works well for both academic institutions and professional certification exams.

Cons:

• Limited options for visual branding and customization.
• Reporting is strong for integrity but less detailed for long-term learning analytics.

How Exam.net Compares to iSpring:

iSpring QuizMaker is strong for creating structured quizzes, but doesn’t cover secure delivery. Exam.net provides the lockdown controls, real-time monitoring, and academic tools that iSpring lacks, making it better suited for high-stakes testing environments.

Pricing: Custom quote available on request. 75-day free trial for schools.

User Rating: 4.6/5 (Capterra)

7. Pear Assessment (Formerly Edulastic) — Best for Standards-Aligned Classroom Assessments

Image source: Pear Deck Learning

Pear Assessment, which many teachers still know as Edulastic, is a go-to platform in K–12 classrooms for building interactive quizzes aligned with standards like Common Core and NGSS. The platform’s library of ready-made question banks makes quiz creation quick, while the variety of formats—drag-and-drop, graphing, and written responses—adds flexibility across different subjects.

In my experience exploring the tool, the live dashboard is what sets it apart. Responses appear instantly as students progress, letting educators spot problem areas without waiting for the end of a test. That shift turns quizzes into real-time diagnostic tools rather than just assessments. 

Add to that smooth integrations with Google Classroom, accessibility features like text-to-speech, and built-in math editors, and it’s easy to see why it has become so widely adopted.

Pros:

• Extensive library of standards-aligned question banks and templates.
• Real-time dashboards with item-level insights for quick intervention.
• Supports multimedia content, math editors, and accessibility tools.
• Integrates seamlessly with Google Classroom and other LMS platforms.

Cons:

• Reporting features are tailored to schools; they are less relevant for corporate training.
• Can face loading issues on school networks with strict firewalls.

How Pear Assessment Compares to iSpring:

iSpring QuizMaker is strong for structured quiz authoring, but doesn’t provide the same in-the-moment visibility into student progress. Pear Assessment focuses heavily on real-time insights and standards alignment, making it a better fit for classroom assessments where quick intervention matters most.

Pricing: Free plan available for teachers. Paid plans start at $125/year.

User Rating: 4.3/5 (G2)

8. Kahoot! — Best for Live, Competitive Quiz Games

Image source: xavier.edu

Kahoot! is still one of the most widely recognized iSpring alternatives for interactive quizzing. Rather than static tests, it turns learning into live sessions that feel more like games, blending competition with group participation. I’ve seen it used in workshops where the music, countdowns, and leaderboards created an atmosphere much closer to a game show than a standard quiz.

The platform covers a range of formats—multiple choice, true/false, polls, puzzles, and even word clouds. On top of that, its community library includes millions of pre-made quizzes across subjects, which makes setup quick for educators and trainers. Organizations can also take advantage of branding options, reporting tools, and participant identifiers to tailor the experience.

Although you can assign Kahoot! activities for homework or asynchronous use, it’s at its best in live group settings where energy and real-time engagement make the biggest impact.

Pros:

• Live gameplay with timers, music, and leaderboards for high engagement.
• Large library of community-created quizzes and trivia games.
• Supports diverse question types, including polls, puzzles, and word clouds.
• Assignable challenges for homework or self-paced study outside live sessions.
• Accessible in over 60 languages, with read-aloud and auto-translate options.

Cons:

• Reports focus mainly on scores and rankings, offering less detail for long-term learning progress.
• Primarily designed for group play, not individual study or formal testing.

How Kahoot! Compares to iSpring:

Kahoot! is all about lively, real-time engagement, whereas iSpring is about structured quiz creation and deployment (often asynchronously). They serve very different purposes. Kahoot! has the edge when you want to energize a class or audience and reinforce learning through competition. 

Pricing:

Free plan available with basic functionality. Paid plans begin from $7.99/host/month, with features scaling by audience size and customization needs.

User Rating: 4.6/5 (G2)

9. AhaSlides — Best for Interactive Quizzes Inside Presentations

Image source: AhaSlides

AhaSlides weaves quizzes directly into slide presentations. Instead of juggling between a deck and a separate quiz tool, everything runs seamlessly within the same workflow. This makes it a practical choice for teachers, trainers, and presenters who want to keep their audience involved without losing momentum.

Creating an interactive slide is simple: you pick a format—whether it’s multiple choice, word cloud, poll, or an open-ended response—and participants join using a code on their phones. Leaderboards update in real time, and instant feedback keeps the session lively and interactive.

While it isn’t built for homework assignments or long-term progress tracking, AhaSlides shines in live settings. For workshops, lessons, or meetings, it adds a layer of interaction that turns ordinary slides into a more engaging experience.

Pros:

• Quizzes integrated directly into presentation slides.
• Multiple interactive formats: polls, word clouds, Q&A, and quizzes.
• Instant results and live leaderboards to keep participants engaged.
• Easy mobile participation via simple join codes.

Cons:

• Not built for homework assignments or asynchronous e-learning.
• Fewer customization options (branding, question banks, etc.) than some competitors.

How AhaSlides Compares to iSpring:

AhaSlides enhances live presentations by embedding questions and polls into your slides—something iSpring doesn’t do. If you’re giving a live lecture or training session, AhaSlides can make it interactive in real time. 

Pricing:

Free plan with limited audience size and features. Paid plans start at $7.95/month, which expands participant limits and unlocks advanced customization.

User Rating: 4.6/5 (G2)

10. Testportal — Best for Skills Testing and Compliance Training

Image source: SoftwareWorld

Testportal is designed for structured, high-stakes assessments rather than casual quizzing. This iSpring alternative is widely used in education, HR, and corporate training where dependable delivery and exam integrity matter most.

Security is one of its strongest features. Administrators can set up access codes, limit attempts, and track time in detail, which creates conditions closer to a traditional exam hall. These measures make it particularly useful for compliance exams or certification programs where cheating prevention is a priority.

Reporting is another area where Testportal delivers value. Instead of stopping at raw scores, the analytics reveal patterns like question difficulty and time spent per item. This level of insight helps educators and organizations not only evaluate performance but also refine their assessments for better outcomes.

Pros:

• Robust security options: passwords, access codes, attempt limits, and time tracking.
• Detailed reporting with insights into performance and question difficulty.
• AI-powered quiz creation from prompts or uploaded documents.
• Integrates with Microsoft Teams and other education platforms.
• Scalable for schools, universities, and businesses.

Cons:

• Limited multimedia support in questions compared to some newer quiz tools.
• Interface is more functional than engaging, which may feel dry for younger learners.

How Testportal Compares to iSpring:

Testportal prioritizes exam security and analytics, making it well-suited for high-stakes testing. iSpring enables creating quizzes, but doesn’t offer built-in proctoring or the same level of controlled access that Testportal does. If you need a compliance-friendly testing environment with anti-cheating measures, Testportal offers that out of the box.

Pricing:

Free plan with basic functionality. Paid plans start at $35/month, unlocking enterprise-level security settings and advanced reporting features.

User Rating: 4.7/5 (G2)

How to Choose an iSpring Alternative

When comparing iSpring alternatives, focus on the criteria that make a tool effective and sustainable for your use case, not just flashy in a demo. Insights from user reviews on platforms like G2 and Capterra can be especially helpful because they reveal how these tools perform in real classrooms and training programs.

1. Ease of Creation: Look for platforms that reduce prep time through templates, question libraries, or automation. For example, ProProfs Quiz Maker can use AI to generate quizzes from docs or prompts, which is a huge time-saver if you’re used to manually creating questions in iSpring.
2. Variety of Question Types: A good tool goes beyond just multiple-choice. Support for drag-and-drop, hotspots, open-ended responses, polls, or multimedia will let you create more engaging and effective assessments. This is one area where a number of iSpring alternatives shine by offering question formats iSpring’s free version doesn’t.
3. Analytics and Reporting: Robust iSpring Quiz Maker alternatives provide detailed insights into performance, not just simple scores. If you need to track progress, look for tools that let you drill down to individual question results and see trends over time or across classes.
4. Engagement Features: Decide what style of engagement you want. Do you need gamification and competition? Self-paced learning? Interactive slides within a presentation? Different tools specialize in different approaches, so pick one that aligns with your teaching or training style.
5. Accessibility and Logistics: Make sure it’s easy for your learners to access the quiz. Some tools use simple game codes or links (great for quick live games), while others integrate with LMS platforms or allow single sign-on. Consider what will be most convenient for your audience.
6. Security and Integrity: If you’re doing high-stakes exams or certifications, features like question randomization, time limits, answer shuffling, browser lockdown, or proctoring are crucial. Not all platforms offer these, so narrow your choices based on the level of security you need.

Evaluating iSpring Quiz Maker alternatives against these factors will give you a clearer sense of which one fits your needs best. Whenever possible, start with a short trial or a free version and run a test quiz. It’s the simplest way to see if a platform delivers the balance of ease, engagement, and insight that you’re looking for.

My Top 3 Picks for iSpring Quiz Maker Alternatives

From my comparisons, three tools came forward as the strongest iSpring QuizMaker alternatives, each serving a different need.

1. ProProfs Quiz Maker

ProProfs combines AI quiz generation, a vast template library, and advanced security settings. It works equally well for quick knowledge checks and formal, large-scale exams. With 20+ interactive formats and detailed analytics, it offers flexibility for classrooms, training programs, and compliance testing in a way iSpring doesn’t.

2. Exam.net

Exam.net is built for exam integrity. Lockdown browsers, live monitoring, and subject-specific tools like equation editors ensure secure delivery across academic and professional contexts. Its simplicity for student access and strong anti-cheating measures make it ideal for high-stakes testing environments where reliability and fairness are essential.

3. Pear Assessment (Edulastic)

Pear Assessment delivers real-time insights during quizzes, enabling educators to act on results immediately. Its library of standards-aligned questions and interactive formats supports diverse subjects, while integrations with platforms like Google Classroom streamline use. By focusing on actionable feedback, it transforms quizzes from static tests into dynamic learning opportunities.

Select Smarter Tools To Strengthen Your Assessments

The real takeaway from exploring iSpring QuizMaker and its competitors is how many strong iSpring alternatives are available today for creating online tests. Some prioritize live engagement, others emphasize exam security, and several pair AI with analytics to reduce prep time and improve decision-making. The range of options is far broader than before.

The key is to match the platform with your specific goals—compliance testing, classroom feedback, or workforce training. By choosing the right fit, you turn quizzes into more than tasks to complete; they become reliable tools for driving insight and learning outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a free version of iSpring QuizMaker?

iSpring offers a free version, but it’s very limited. You only get three question types and basic quiz settings. Advanced features like branching, hotspots, or detailed reporting require the paid edition. Many users prefer iSpring alternatives like ProProfs Quiz Maker or Wayground, which provide stronger free plans with more flexibility.

Which iSpring alternatives are best for secure exams?

When exam integrity matters, Testportal, Exam.net, TestInvite, and ClassMarker are widely recommended for their proctoring tools, lockdown browsers, and monitoring options. ProProfs Quiz Maker is also a strong option, pairing browser lockdown, randomization, and anti-cheating with fast quiz creation. Together, these platforms provide more controlled exam environments than iSpring QuizMaker.

Which iSpring alternatives work best for classrooms?

Teachers often turn to Wayground and Pear Assessment for self-paced practice, real-time dashboards, and curriculum alignment. Blooket and Kahoot! are popular for adding energy through game formats that keep students motivated. These classroom-focused alternatives to iSpring quiz creator combine engagement with data, making them better suited to everyday teaching than static quiz builders.

How do iSpring alternatives compare in analytics and reporting?

iSpring offers basic reporting, but most alternatives go further. ProProfs Quiz Maker and Testportal give question-level insights and performance breakdowns. Pear Assessment shows results in real time, while Wayground tracks trends over time. These reporting capabilities help teachers and trainers act quickly on feedback rather than just reviewing raw scores.

How should I choose the right iSpring alternative?

The best option depends on your goals. For secure, compliance-level exams, Testportal, Exam.net, or TestInvite work well. For classrooms, Wayground, Pear Assessment, or Blooket bring engagement and feedback. ProProfs Quiz Maker combines AI-driven creation with exam security, offering flexibility for schools and businesses. Match the tool’s strengths to your needs.