Bab 10 : Sarawak Dan Sabah

Explanation
The statement is true because it states that the pottery production centers in Gua Niah, Sarawak and Bukit Tengkorak, Semporna, Sabah are evidence of the connection between Sarawak and Sabah with the Malay world and the outside world. This implies that the pottery made in these places reflects the cultural and trade exchanges between Sarawak, Sabah, and other regions, indicating their connection with the wider Malay world and the global community.

Explanation
During the seventh century, Santubong was an early kingdom that had a port in the Sarawak river valley.

Explanation
The given statement is false. The iron smelting industry did not emerge in Semporna, Sabah in the 13th century.

Explanation
The statement is true because the rapid progress in trade in Sarawak and Sabah led to other kingdoms in the Malay world expanding their influence in these regions. The increased trade activities would have attracted the attention of neighboring kingdoms, who would have sought to establish trade relations and extend their influence in order to benefit from the economic opportunities available.

Explanation
The statement is true because the Kingdom of Srivijaya did expand its influence to the southern region of Sarawak in order to control trade in the South China Sea. Srivijaya was a powerful maritime empire that dominated the trade routes in Southeast Asia during the 7th to 13th centuries. Its strategic location allowed it to control and benefit from the trade between China, India, and other Southeast Asian countries. The expansion of Srivijaya's influence to Sarawak was part of its efforts to maintain control over the lucrative trade routes in the region.

Explanation
The statement suggests that the presence of iron axes in Pulau Banggi, Sabah proves the existence of a trade relationship between the Majapahit kingdom and the inhabitants of northern Sabah. However, without further evidence or historical documentation, it is not possible to conclude that there was a direct trade relationship between the two. Therefore, the statement is false.

Explanation
The statement is true because the decline of the Majapahit Empire led to the rise of the influence of the Sultanate of Brunei and the Sultanate of Sulu. As the Majapahit Empire weakened, these two Sultanates were able to expand their territories and exert their influence over the region. This resulted in the spread of their culture, trade, and political power. Therefore, the decline of Majapahit indeed brought about the development of the influence of the Sultanate of Brunei and the Sultanate of Sulu.

Explanation
The statement is true because it states that the Sambas Kingdom has handed over its territory in Sarawak to the Brunei Malay Sultanate. This suggests that there was a transfer of power or authority between the two entities, indicating a historical event or agreement.

Explanation
The statement suggests that the rise of the Santubong Malay kingdom weakened the Brunei Malay Sultanate. However, without any further information or context, it is not possible to determine the accuracy of this statement. Therefore, the answer "False" indicates that the statement is not supported or is incorrect.

Explanation
The statement is true because Sarawak and Sabah, two states in Malaysia, have indeed been influenced by the arrival of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam. These religions have played a significant role in shaping the cultural and religious landscape of both states. Hinduism and Buddhism were introduced to the region through trade and migration, while Islam spread through the influence of Muslim traders and missionaries. Today, these religions coexist alongside indigenous beliefs and other faiths, contributing to the diverse religious fabric of Sarawak and Sabah.