Law Quiz - Criminal Law

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By K.kryulko
K
K.kryulko
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 2,634
Questions: 6 | Attempts: 2,634

SettingsSettingsSettings
Law Quiz - Criminal Law - Quiz

This quiz is testing you on your knowledge of A2 Criminal Law! :)


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 

    What is section 39 of the offences against the person act?

    • A.

      ABH

    • B.

      Assault

    • C.

      Battery

    • D.

      GBH

    • E.

      Assult and Battery

    Correct Answer
    E. Assult and Battery
    Explanation
    Section 39 of the Offences Against the Person Act deals with assault and battery. Assault refers to the act of intentionally causing someone to apprehend immediate unlawful violence, while battery involves the intentional application of unlawful force on another person. This section combines both offenses, making it an offense to commit assault and battery against another person.

    Rate this question:

  • 2. 

    The Offences Against the Persons act what written in (....)

    Correct Answer
    1861
    Explanation
    The Offences Against the Persons Act was written in 1861.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    What happened in R V Lamb?

    • A.

      D and a friend V were playing with a revolver. In the chamber there were two bullets, but neither was opposite the hammer when D, in jest, pointed the gun at V and pulled the trigger. The chamber rotated and V was killed.

    • B.

      D slashed P's clothes with a knife. The judge said this was enough: it is an assault on a man's person to inflict injury to the clothes on his back. In the ordinary case of a blow on the back there is clearly an assault, though the blow is received by the coat on the person.

    • C.

      A school caretaker was convicted of indecent assault after taking hold of the hem of a 12-year-old girl's skirt.

    • D.

      A soldier D became involved in an argument with another man C in a pub. He took off his belt and swung it at C, but missed and wounded the landlady V. His conviction for unlawfully wounding V was upheld by the Court for Crown Cases Reserved; the intention to strike C was transferred to V under the doctrine of transferred malice.

    • E.

      stepmother D hit a 10-year-old boy with a slipper on his head and bottom for alleged misbehaviour, leaving a number of bruises. She was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, but the Court of Appeal recognised her sense of inadequacy as a parent, and reduced her sentence to twelve months' imprisonment

    Correct Answer
    A. D and a friend V were playing with a revolver. In the chamber there were two bullets, but neither was opposite the hammer when D, in jest, pointed the gun at V and pulled the trigger. The chamber rotated and V was killed.
    Explanation
    In R v Lamb, the defendant (D) and his friend (V) were playing with a revolver that had two bullets in the chamber. However, neither of the bullets was opposite the hammer when D, jokingly, pointed the gun at V and pulled the trigger. Due to the rotation of the chamber, V was killed. This explanation provides a summary of the events that occurred in the case without explicitly stating the correct answer.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    What are the 3 special defences of murder?

  • 5. 

    What is unlawful act manslaughter?

    • A.

      A murder that is socially wrong.

    • B.

      An act that is illegal, dangerous, and causes death

    • C.

      An act that results in ABH

    • D.

      An act of sadomasicism

    • E.

      An act where by the defendant directly intends the outcome

    Correct Answer
    B. An act that is illegal, dangerous, and causes death
    Explanation
    Unlawful act manslaughter refers to a situation where a person causes the death of another person through an illegal and dangerous act. This means that the act committed by the person is not only against the law but also poses a significant risk to the safety and well-being of others. The death caused by such an act may not have been directly intended by the person, but it occurred as a result of their unlawful and dangerous behavior.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    Explain what happened in R V Brown

    • A.

      D threw an empty box from a pier into the sea and accidentally hit a bather, causing his death. The judge said this was not an unlawful act sufficient for manslaughter: the intentional tort (trespass to goods) against the owner of the box was insufficient.

    • B.

      A man D set fire to his council house, hoping to be moved to a better one, but his wife, one of his children, and another woman died in the fire. D was convicted of manslaughter on the basis that death had been caused by his intentional, unlawful and dangerous act constituting the crime of arson

    • C.

      D made fireworks contrary to statute and stored explosives for this purpose. A fire broke out accidentally or by the negligence of others, and a rocket set fire to an adjacent house, killing its occupant. Cockburn CJ said the unlawful act - the keeping of the fireworks - did not in itself cause the death, and D's conviction was quashed.

    • D.

      A tramp took shelter in an empty house, and went to sleep with a cigarette in his hand. He awoke a little later to find that he had set the mattress alight, so he got up, went into another room, and went to sleep there. The fire took hold and the house burned down.

    • E.

      The appellants belonged to a group of sado-masochistic homosexuals who over a 10-year period from 1978 willingly participated in the commission of acts of violence against each other, including genital torture, for the sexual pleasure which it engendered in the giving and receiving of pain.

    Correct Answer
    E. The appellants belonged to a group of sado-masochistic homosexuals who over a 10-year period from 1978 willingly participated in the commission of acts of violence against each other, including genital torture, for the sexual pleasure which it engendered in the giving and receiving of pain.

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • May 17, 2024
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Jan 05, 2010
    Quiz Created by
    K.kryulko
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.