Nursing Research NCLEX Practice Quiz 6 (10 Questions)

Metasynthesis is a research method that involves the synthesis of multiple qualitative studies to generate new insights or theories. It aims to integrate and analyze a large amount of qualitative data from different studies to identify common themes, patterns, or concepts. By synthesizing critical masses of qualitative findings, metasynthesis allows for a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon or research question. It helps to uncover overarching themes and provide a more comprehensive view of the topic being studied.

An intrinsic case study is undertaken to have a better understanding of the case.

Data are collected using the emic perspective (A). The grounded-theory method is a process of constructing theory from human experience (B). In grounded-theory only primary sources (the participants) are used (C).

The constant-comparative method is the term used for the coding and clustering of data to form categories in the grounded-theory method. This method involves constantly comparing new data with previously collected data to identify similarities and differences, and then developing categories based on these comparisons. It is a systematic and iterative process that allows researchers to develop a theory grounded in the data.

This question is helpful in determining the study's credibility because if the participants recognize the experience as their own, it suggests that the study accurately captured their experiences and that the data collected is reliable. This indicates that the study was conducted in a valid and trustworthy manner, enhancing its credibility.

Credibility is the truth of findings as judged by the participants (A). Auditability assists the reader to judge the appropriateness of the interview questions posed (B). Auditability assists the reader to judge the adequacy of the coding system used (D).

The scientific criteria appropriate for qualitative research include auditability, credibility, and fittingness. Auditability refers to the ability to trace the research process and findings, ensuring transparency and accountability. Credibility refers to the trustworthiness and believability of the research findings, often achieved through triangulation and member checking. Fittingness refers to the relevance and applicability of the research findings to the research context and participants. These criteria ensure that qualitative research is rigorous, trustworthy, and relevant, enhancing the validity and quality of the research findings.

Ethical concerns for qualitative researchers include the fact that the study emerges over time, which means that the researcher must continuously monitor and reassess ethical considerations throughout the research process. Additionally, the researcher and participant interact over a period of time, which requires the researcher to establish and maintain a trusting and respectful relationship, ensuring the participant's well-being and privacy are protected. These ethical concerns are important to uphold the principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for the participant's autonomy.

Qualitative outcome analysis can be used to confirm the applicability of clinical strategies by examining the effectiveness of these strategies in real-world settings. It can also be used to develop interventions by identifying potential areas for improvement and testing those selected interventions. Additionally, qualitative outcome analysis can help build theory by generating new insights and understanding about the underlying processes and mechanisms behind the observed outcomes.

The correct answer is "Can the reader follow the researcher’s thinking?" and "Are the results meaningful to individuals not involved in the research?" These two questions are important when critiquing a qualitative study because they assess the clarity and comprehensibility of the researcher's thinking and whether the results have broader relevance beyond the study participants. It is crucial for the reader to be able to understand the researcher's thought process and for the results to have meaningful implications for a wider audience.