1.
What is another term for reserved powers?
Correct Answer
D. All of the above
Explanation
The correct answer is "All of the above" because reserved powers, discretionary powers, and prerogative powers are all different terms that refer to the same concept. Reserved powers are powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government in the United States Constitution and are therefore reserved for the states. Discretionary powers are powers that are granted to a government or authority to make decisions based on their own judgment. Prerogative powers are powers that are inherent to a particular office or position. Therefore, all three terms are synonymous and refer to powers that are not explicitly delegated to a higher authority.
2.
Which of the following actions is not part of reserved powers under constitutional monarchy?
Correct Answer
D. To issue license plates of vehicles
Explanation
In a constitutional monarchy, the power to issue license plates of vehicles is not considered a reserved power. Reserved powers typically refer to the powers that are specifically granted to the monarch or the royal family, such as granting pardon, dismissing a Prime Minister, and dissolving a Parliament. The authority to issue license plates of vehicles is usually delegated to a separate government agency or department responsible for motor vehicles. Therefore, it is not considered a part of the reserved powers under a constitutional monarchy.
3.
A king could delegate reserved powers or royal prerogative to whom?
Correct Answer
A. Governor General
Explanation
The correct answer is Governor General. In a monarchy, the king or queen holds certain powers and prerogatives that are reserved for them. However, they can delegate some of these powers to a Governor General, who acts as their representative and carries out certain duties on their behalf. This delegation allows the king or queen to focus on other responsibilities while still ensuring that important tasks are being handled by a trusted individual.
4.
In Belgium, what should be indicated in constitutional provision to make an act of the Monarch valid and binding?
Correct Answer
B. Signature of the members of government
Explanation
In Belgium, for an act of the Monarch to be valid and binding, it should be indicated in the constitutional provision that it requires the signature of the members of the government. This means that the act must be approved and endorsed by the government officials, ensuring that it aligns with the policies and decisions of the government as a whole. This requirement helps to maintain a system of checks and balances and ensures that the Monarch's actions are in line with the government's agenda.
5.
Which of the following is a major theoretical personal prerogative of the United Kingdom's Monarch?
Correct Answer
D. All of the above
Explanation
The United Kingdom's Monarch has the theoretical personal prerogative to refuse to dissolve a Parliament, appoint a Prime Minister, and dismiss a Prime Minister. This means that the Monarch has the power to reject a request to dissolve Parliament, choose who will be the Prime Minister, and remove the Prime Minister from office. These prerogatives give the Monarch a significant role in the political processes of the United Kingdom.
6.
Reserved powers were used on how many occasions in Australia?
Correct Answer
B. Twice
7.
From what country does this principle exist: "The Queen reigns, but the government rules,so long as it has the support of the House of Representatives".
Correct Answer
D. New Zealand
Explanation
The principle described in the question suggests a constitutional monarchy where the Queen holds a symbolic role as the head of state, while the government, with the support of the House of Representatives, holds the real power. Among the given options, this principle is most closely associated with New Zealand. Australia, Canada, and Great Britain also have constitutional monarchies, but their systems of government differ slightly.
8.
Unlike other constitutional monarchs, who has no reserved powers?
Correct Answer
D. B & C
Explanation
The correct answer is B & C, Emperor of Japan and King of Sweden. Unlike other constitutional monarchs, the Emperor of Japan and the King of Sweden have no reserved powers. Reserved powers refer to powers that are not explicitly granted to the government or the people and are instead reserved for the monarch. In the case of Japan and Sweden, their monarchs have limited or ceremonial roles with no real political power or authority.