1.
Persuasive appeals are directed at reader's sense of logical reasoning.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
Persuasive appeals are not directed at the reader's sense of logical reasoning. Instead, they are aimed at appealing to the reader's emotions, values, or beliefs in order to influence their thoughts or actions. Logical reasoning is more commonly associated with informative or argumentative appeals, where evidence and logical arguments are used to persuade the reader. Therefore, the statement that persuasive appeals are directed at the reader's sense of logical reasoning is false.
2.
Which type of writing below would be a place where you would most likely NOT see logical appeals being used.
Correct Answer
C. A magazine advertisement
Explanation
Logical appeals are typically used in scientific, philosophical, legal, and technical writing to present reasoned arguments and evidence. However, in a magazine advertisement, the primary goal is to persuade and attract consumers rather than presenting logical arguments. Advertisements often rely on emotional appeals, catchy slogans, and visual imagery to grab the attention of the audience and promote a product or service. Therefore, a magazine advertisement is a place where logical appeals are least likely to be used.
3.
"All women are mortal. Jeanne is a woman. Jeanne is mortal." This statement is an example of a syllogism.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
This statement is an example of a syllogism because it consists of two premises (All women are mortal, Jeanne is a woman) and a conclusion (Jeanne is mortal). A syllogism is a logical argument that follows a specific structure, where the conclusion is inferred from the two premises. In this case, the conclusion logically follows from the given premises, making the statement true.
4.
A Thesis can be placed anywhere in an argument.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
A thesis can be placed anywhere in an argument because it is the main point or central idea that the argument revolves around. It can be presented at the beginning of the argument to provide a clear focus and guide the reader, or it can be placed later in the argument to build up to a strong conclusion. The placement of the thesis depends on the writer's preference and the effectiveness of the argument structure.
5.
The statements: "If we can put a man on the moon, we should be able to care the common cold" and "My job sucks, it is basically slavery," are examples of what?
Correct Answer
D. False analogy
Explanation
The given statements are examples of a false analogy. A false analogy occurs when two things are compared that are not truly comparable. In this case, comparing the ability to put a man on the moon with finding a cure for the common cold is an illogical comparison. The two situations are not similar enough to make a valid analogy. Similarly, comparing a job that is disliked to slavery is also an inappropriate analogy as it diminishes the severity and historical significance of slavery.
6.
The term rhetoric can best be described as...
Correct Answer
B. The art of persuasion, including all the strategies that a writer uses to make his/her argument
Explanation
The term rhetoric refers to the art of persuasion and encompasses all the strategies that a writer employs to effectively present their argument. It involves using language and communication techniques to influence and convince an audience. Rhetoric is not simply about writing clearly and effectively on a topic, but rather about using persuasive tactics to sway opinions and win over others. It is a skillful process that requires understanding the audience, crafting compelling arguments, and employing various rhetorical devices to make a persuasive case.
7.
Ethos is an appeal to what?
Correct Answer
C. Credibility and character
Explanation
Ethos is an appeal to credibility and character. It is a persuasive technique that relies on the speaker's reputation, expertise, and trustworthiness to convince the audience. By establishing themselves as knowledgeable and trustworthy, speakers can gain the audience's confidence and persuade them to accept their arguments or beliefs. Emotions, logic, and linear reasoning are not specifically related to ethos, although they can be used in conjunction with ethos to strengthen an argument.
8.
What are the central goals of written argumentation?
Correct Answer
B. To attempt to convince a reader to agree with a particular point of view, to make a particular decision, or to pursue a particular course of action
Explanation
The central goals of written argumentation are to attempt to convince a reader to agree with a particular point of view, to make a particular decision, or to pursue a particular course of action.
9.
The strongest and most effective arguments are made up of purely logical appeals .
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
The statement that the strongest and most effective arguments are made up of purely logical appeals is false. While logical appeals are important in constructing a strong argument, effective arguments also rely on other elements such as emotional appeals, credibility, and evidence. By incorporating these additional components, an argument can be more persuasive and resonate with the audience on a deeper level. Therefore, a purely logical appeal may not always be the strongest or most effective approach.
10.
Two basic patterns of thinking and presenting our thought in argumentation are?
Correct Answer
A. Induction and deduction
Explanation
The correct answer is induction and deduction. Induction refers to the process of reasoning from specific instances to general principles or conclusions, while deduction involves reasoning from general principles or premises to specific conclusions. These two patterns of thinking and presenting our thoughts in argumentation are fundamental in logic and critical thinking, allowing us to make logical and well-supported arguments based on evidence and reasoning.
11.
Which statement below is most likely a type of Inductive Reasoning?
Correct Answer
D. All of the above
Explanation
All of the statements provided in the options are examples of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. In each of the given statements, a general conclusion is drawn based on specific instances or observations. In the first statement, the conclusion that the person is allergic to peanuts is based on the specific observation that their throat swells up and they can't breathe every time they eat peanuts. In the second statement, the conclusion that all girls in the neighborhood are blond is based on the specific observation that all the girls in the class are blond. In the third statement, the conclusion that every cat must purr is based on the specific observation that all the cats observed have purred. Therefore, all of the given options demonstrate inductive reasoning.
12.
Inductive Reasoning is the most common type of reasoning.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
Inductive reasoning is the most common type of reasoning because it involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or patterns. It is widely used in scientific research, problem-solving, and everyday life. Inductive reasoning allows us to make predictions and form hypotheses about future events or situations based on past experiences or evidence. This type of reasoning is essential for making informed decisions and understanding the world around us.
13.
In an Inductive leap, the writer...
Correct Answer
C. Makes a leap from the observable evidence to a generalized claim
Explanation
In an inductive leap, the writer moves from specific observable evidence to a more general claim. This means that the writer is making a logical jump based on the evidence they have observed, and drawing a broader conclusion or generalization from it. This can be seen as a way of reasoning from specific instances to a more general pattern or principle. The other options, such as switching verb tense or time traveling, do not accurately describe the concept of an inductive leap.
14.
Deductive Reasoning moves from a set of specific examples to a general statement.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
Deductive reasoning actually moves from a general statement to specific examples. It starts with a general premise or theory and then applies it to specific situations to draw conclusions. This process involves making logical inferences based on the given information. Therefore, the correct answer is false.
15.
A type of Deductive Reasoning that uses a three-part model consisting of two premises and a conclusion is called...
Correct Answer
C. A syllogism
Explanation
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that uses a three-part model consisting of two premises and a conclusion. In a syllogism, the premises are statements or propositions that are assumed to be true, and the conclusion is logically derived from the premises using deductive logic. This type of reasoning helps to establish logical connections between ideas and allows for the evaluation of arguments based on their validity and soundness. Therefore, the correct answer for this question is a syllogism.
16.
Usually a persuasive essay does not have a thesis.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
A persuasive essay does have a thesis. A thesis is a clear and concise statement that presents the main argument or point of view of the essay. In a persuasive essay, the thesis is essential as it guides the writer in presenting and supporting their argument throughout the essay. Without a thesis, the essay lacks focus and direction, making it less persuasive and effective in convincing the reader of the writer's viewpoint. Therefore, the statement that a persuasive essay does not have a thesis is incorrect.
17.
Which below represents the structure of a syllogism?
Correct Answer
D. Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion
Explanation
A syllogism is a logical argument that consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. The major premise is a general statement or principle, the minor premise is a specific statement or example that relates to the major premise, and the conclusion is the logical result or inference drawn from the premises. This structure allows for deductive reasoning, where the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Therefore, the correct answer is "Major Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion."
18.
What are the two categories of argumenatation that most people who study argument identify?
Correct Answer
C. Persuasion and Logic
Explanation
Persuasion and Logic are the two categories of argumentation that most people who study argument identify. Persuasion involves using emotional appeals, credibility, and personal beliefs to convince others of a particular viewpoint. Logic, on the other hand, relies on reasoning, evidence, and logical consistency to support a claim. These two categories represent different approaches to constructing and presenting arguments, with persuasion appealing to emotions and beliefs, and logic appealing to reason and evidence.