Breakthrough Intl Bible University - Foundational Theology

The Neo-Thomist approach to theology assumes the validity of tradition and is commonly used in modern apologetics. Counter Critical, as the correct answer, suggests a perspective that challenges or opposes critical thinking. It implies a stance that goes against questioning or analyzing traditional beliefs and instead emphasizes the importance of accepting them without skepticism. This aligns with the Neo-Thomist approach, which values the authority and reliability of tradition in theological discussions.

Post Critical is the correct answer because it refers to a theological method that begins with a presupposition of trust, acknowledging the importance of faith, but still values reason and critical thinking. This approach recognizes the need to critically analyze and evaluate theological concepts and beliefs while maintaining a foundation of trust in religious teachings. It encourages open-mindedness and a willingness to engage in dialogue and reflection, seeking a balance between faith and reason.

The correct answer is "Traditionalist." A traditionalist is someone who wants to reclaim old traditions in response to a modern "drowning in secularism." This individual believes in preserving and upholding traditional values, customs, and practices that may be threatened or disregarded in a secular society. They may advocate for a return to religious or cultural traditions, seeking to maintain a sense of continuity and stability in the face of societal changes.

This understanding of Dogmatic Development can be categorized as Logical because it is based on deducing propositions from previously deduced propositions. In this case, the Marian doctrine is derived through logical reasoning and deduction from existing propositions or beliefs.

The explanation for the given correct answer is that the discussion about Theological Commission document states that false teaching breaks communion of Love or is outside of communion with the Church. Therefore, it can be inferred that the statement is true. False teaching goes against the teachings and beliefs of the Church, causing a rupture in the communion of love and unity within the Church.

Transcendental Thomism is the correct answer because it refers to a philosophical-theological bridge that combines Thomism with a Cartesian subjectivist approach to knowledge and Kantian epistemology. This approach seeks to reconcile the teachings of Thomas Aquinas with the ideas of René Descartes and Immanuel Kant, specifically in relation to knowledge and understanding. Transcendental Thomism aims to integrate these different philosophical perspectives into a cohesive framework.

The statement suggests that philosophy serves as a bridge between theology and science, facilitating a dialogue between the two disciplines. Philosophy can help theologians understand scientific concepts and theories, while also enabling scientists to explore philosophical questions related to the nature of existence, ethics, and the divine. This interaction between theology and science can lead to a deeper understanding of both fields and foster a more holistic approach to knowledge and inquiry.

Neo-Thomism is the correct answer because it aligns with the description provided. Neo-Thomism refers to a movement that aims to revive and apply the teachings of Thomas Aquinas, a prominent philosopher and theologian from the 13th century, to contemporary philosophical and theological questions. It seeks to bridge the gap between philosophy and theology by using Thomistic principles. The mention of Descartes indicates that this movement is influenced by his ideas, further supporting the choice of Neo-Thomism as the correct answer.

This statement about God is anological. It suggests that while God is good, this goodness is not the same as the goodness found in creatures. Instead, God's goodness is described as being perfectly good, implying a higher and more complete form of goodness. Anological statements use analogies or comparisons to help explain or describe concepts that are beyond human comprehension. In this case, the analogy is used to convey the idea that God's goodness is of a different nature than what we typically understand.

Little t tradition refers to the customs, practices, and beliefs that develop within a specific cultural or local context, in response to encounters with the Gospel. These traditions are not considered essential to the core beliefs of the Church, but they help bind the community together and foster a communal sense of faith. Therefore, the answer "Can develop as Gospel encounters with new cultures" accurately describes little t tradition.

Critical theology is a method of theology that requires all truth claims to be subjected to radical doubt. This means that critical theologians critically analyze and question all beliefs and doctrines, not accepting them blindly. They seek to challenge and deconstruct traditional understandings of religious concepts in order to arrive at a deeper understanding of truth. By engaging in critical thinking and questioning, critical theology aims to uncover new insights and interpretations within religious traditions.

Husserl is the correct answer because he is a philosopher known for founding phenomenology. Phenomenology is a philosophical approach that focuses on the study of conscious experience and the ways in which we perceive and interpret the world. Husserl's work in phenomenology has had a significant impact on philosophy and has influenced many other philosophers and thinkers.

The Hebrew word "dabar" encompasses both the spoken Word of God, which conveys knowledge, and a sense of effectiveness that causes movement in the world. It implies that when God speaks, His words not only communicate information but also have the power to bring about change and action. The word "dabar" captures the idea that God's spoken Word is not passive or empty, but rather active and transformative.

Vatican II does not state that Scripture is materially sufficient. Instead, it affirms that Scripture, along with Tradition, is a source of divine revelation. This means that both Scripture and Tradition are necessary for a complete understanding of God's revelation. Therefore, the correct answer is False.

The correct answer is "What has always been believed." This definition of Tradition refers to the beliefs and teachings that have been passed down through generations within the Catholic Church. It encompasses the oral teachings, customs, and practices that have been consistently upheld and accepted by the Church over time. This definition emphasizes the importance of continuity and the preservation of core beliefs and doctrines. The other options, such as "The magisterium and scripture only" and "Pascal mystery," do not fully capture the comprehensive nature of Tradition.

Irenaeus, a second century Bishop, believed that true knowledge lies in understanding that Christ is the center of everything. According to him, this understanding helps in comprehending Tradition and scripture. Irenaeus emphasized the importance of Christ as the focal point and foundation of all knowledge and faith. This perspective highlights the significance of Christ's teachings and his role in shaping our understanding of religious texts and practices.

In this theological approach, the comparison is being made between fact and science on one hand, and religion and feeling on the other hand. The term "para critical" is used to describe this approach, which suggests that it goes beyond the critical analysis of facts and science, and instead focuses on inner experiences and feelings associated with religion. It implies that this approach acknowledges the importance of subjective experiences and emotions in understanding and interpreting religious beliefs and practices.

Unity is not Theological Uniformity, and leaves room for pluralism.

The correct answer is "All of the above." This means that faith encompasses trust in what we know as truth, intelligible content, personal beliefs, and ecclesiastical matters. Faith can involve relying on what we consider to be true, understanding and comprehending information, having a personal connection to our beliefs, and being involved in religious or church-related matters.

This model of revelation, known as historical-salvational, focuses primarily on the actions and events of God throughout history that bring about salvation. It highlights the significance of God's interventions and the impact they have on humanity's redemption. The content of the revelation is not the main emphasis in this model, but rather the historical and salvational aspects. It recognizes that God's work in the world, particularly in the context of salvation, is the central aspect of revelation.

The term "Paschal Mystery" refers to the passion, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It encompasses the events leading up to Jesus' crucifixion, his sacrifice for humanity's sins, and his subsequent resurrection from the dead. This term highlights the central theme of Christianity, emphasizing the importance of Jesus' sacrifice and the hope and redemption it brings to believers. The Paschal Mystery is a fundamental aspect of Christian theology and is celebrated annually during the Easter season.

The statement that Christ is the Alpha and Omega reflects a Kairos time statement about Christ. Kairos refers to a specific moment or opportune time, rather than a linear or chronological time. By calling Christ the Alpha and Omega, it signifies that he is the beginning and the end, encompassing all time and eternity. This statement emphasizes the divine nature of Christ and his eternal significance in the grand scheme of things.

This understanding of Dogmatic Development as demonstrated by change and mutability of doctrine aligns with the Modernist perspective. Modernism emphasizes the idea that religious beliefs and doctrines should evolve and adapt to the changing times and contexts. It rejects the notion of fixed and unchanging dogmas, instead advocating for a more flexible and progressive interpretation of religious teachings. This view is in contrast to the traditional and conservative stance of the other options (Logical, Theological, and Ecclesial Transformative), which generally uphold the stability and permanence of doctrine.

Phenomenology can be summarized as the understanding of being as it is made known to the person. This means that it focuses on the individual's subjective experiences and how they perceive and interpret the world around them. It emphasizes the importance of personal perspectives and the unique ways in which individuals make sense of their own reality. Phenomenology does not prioritize external data or objective knowledge as the sole source of understanding, but rather recognizes the significance of personal experiences in shaping one's understanding of being.

In this model of revelation, faith is understood as an intellectual assent to objective content. This means that faith is based on accepting and believing in the doctrines and propositions of a particular religious tradition. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and accepting the teachings and beliefs of the faith, rather than relying solely on personal experiences or subjective expressions of faith. This model views faith as a cognitive exercise, where individuals use their intellect to comprehend and affirm the objective truths of their religious tradition.

The statement that tradition holds that all truths are contained in scripture is not true. Tradition in Christianity includes not only scripture but also the teachings, practices, and beliefs that have been passed down through generations. It recognizes the authority of scripture but also acknowledges the role of the Church and the Holy Spirit in interpreting and understanding the truths of the Christian faith.

This model of revelation suggests that there is a privileged interior grace involved in the process. It emphasizes the individual's inner experience and expression of their faith as a means of understanding and receiving revelation. This model focuses on the personal and subjective aspects of revelation, highlighting the transformative power of individual experiences and expressions of faith.

An equivocal predication about God expresses absolute difference because it suggests that there is a complete and total distinction between God and any other entity or concept. This means that there is no similarity or shared characteristics between God and anything else, emphasizing the uniqueness and incomparability of God.

This understanding of Dogmatic Development is theological because it pertains to the propositions of the Creed and their connection to the salvific object of faith. Theological understanding focuses on the study and interpretation of religious doctrines and beliefs, which is applicable in this context.

This model of revelation focuses on the transformative power of the church community and its actions. It emphasizes that revelation is not just about the statement of faith, but also about the way God works through the church to bring about transformation in individuals and society. This model sees the church as an agent of God's revelation, actively participating in God's work in the world.

The explanation for the answer being "False" is that Vatican II does not state that one can only choose either a Historical-critical or Canaonical-critical interpretation of scripture. Instead, Vatican II encourages scholars to use both methods to understand the scripture more comprehensively. This means that one can employ both Historical-critical and Canaonical-critical approaches simultaneously, making the statement false.

This understanding of Dogmatic Development is categorized as Ecclesial Transformative because it emphasizes the idea of Christ giving Himself to us and displaying the selfhood of the other. This suggests a transformative experience within the context of the Church, where individuals are impacted and changed by encountering Christ.

The given answer suggests that the counterpart of Liberation Theory in terms of its influential figure or theorist is Transcendental Thomism, represented by Rahner. This implies that just as Marx is associated with Liberation Theory, Rahner is associated with Transcendental Thomism.

Jean Daniélou used the words "Holiness, Justice, Mercy, and Truth" to describe God in the Old Testament. These words reflect different aspects of God's character and attributes. Holiness refers to God's purity and sacredness, Justice emphasizes God's fairness and righteousness, Mercy highlights God's compassion and forgiveness, and Truth signifies God's faithfulness and reliability. Together, these words provide a comprehensive understanding of God's nature and how He interacts with His creation.