1.
9/11 shocked the world and ushered in a global “war on terror”.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
The statement is true because the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City were a significant event that had a profound impact on the world. The attacks were carried out by the terrorist group Al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden. This event led to a global response, with many countries joining the United States in a "war on terror" to combat terrorism and prevent future attacks. The 9/11 attacks changed the way the world viewed and approached terrorism, making it a global priority.
2.
High fuel costs, soaring commodity prices together with fears of global recession are worries that affect only the developing countries.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
This statement is false because high fuel costs, soaring commodity prices, and fears of global recession are not worries that affect only developing countries. These issues have a global impact and can affect both developed and developing countries alike.
3.
Children die quietly in some of the poorest villages on earth from diseases that are preventable and treatable.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
The statement implies that children in some of the poorest villages on earth are dying from diseases that could have been prevented or treated. This suggests that there is a lack of access to healthcare and resources in these villages, leading to unnecessary deaths. Therefore, the answer "True" indicates that the statement is correct and that children are indeed dying quietly in these impoverished areas.
4.
Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS continue to affect and take the lives of both poor and rich across the world.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
Infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, do not discriminate based on wealth or social status. These diseases can affect individuals from all walks of life, regardless of their financial resources. Therefore, it is true that infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS continue to impact and claim the lives of both poor and rich individuals worldwide.
5.
Global inequality in consumption of world resources remains high despite economic development.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
The statement suggests that economic development has not effectively reduced global inequality in the consumption of world resources. This implies that even though some countries may have experienced economic growth, there is still a significant disparity in the distribution and utilization of resources globally. This could be due to factors such as unequal access to resources, disparities in wealth and income distribution, and the concentration of resources in certain regions or countries. Overall, the statement implies that economic development alone is not sufficient to address global inequality in resource consumption.
6.
United Nations is the only forum that addresses issues that transcend national boundaries.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
The statement is false because while the United Nations is an important forum for addressing global issues, it is not the only one. There are other international organizations, such as the World Health Organization, World Trade Organization, and International Monetary Fund, that also address issues that transcend national boundaries. Additionally, regional organizations like the European Union and African Union also play a role in addressing cross-border issues within their respective regions. Therefore, the United Nations is not the sole forum for addressing such issues.
7.
Brain drain is a non-sustainable because poor countries lose their skilled workers to richer countries.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
Brain drain refers to the emigration of highly skilled and educated individuals from one country to another, usually from poorer countries to wealthier ones. This phenomenon is considered non-sustainable because it creates a significant loss for the countries experiencing brain drain. When skilled workers leave, it can hinder the development and growth of their home countries, as they lose valuable human capital and expertise. This further widens the economic gap between richer and poorer nations. Therefore, the statement that brain drain is non-sustainable is true.
8.
The human costs of lack of access to clean drinking water are low in poor and developing countries.
Correct Answer
B. False
Explanation
The statement is false because the human costs of lack of access to clean drinking water are actually high in poor and developing countries. Without access to clean water, people are more susceptible to waterborne diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, and typhoid, which can lead to illness and even death. Additionally, the lack of clean water can also result in poor sanitation and hygiene practices, further exacerbating health issues. Therefore, the human costs are significant in these countries.
9.
Food and agricultural production is sustainable and necessary for human and economic development.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
The statement suggests that food and agricultural production are both sustainable and necessary for human and economic development. This implies that without food and agricultural production, it would be challenging to achieve long-term development and meet the needs of the growing population. Additionally, sustainable practices in food and agriculture ensure that resources are managed efficiently, minimizing negative environmental impacts and promoting long-term viability. Therefore, the statement is true.
10.
Nuclear weapons provide nations a sense of security from threats of terrorism, war and other conflicts.
Correct Answer
A. True
Explanation
Nuclear weapons can provide nations with a sense of security from threats of terrorism, war, and other conflicts because they possess immense destructive power. The possession of nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent to potential adversaries, as the fear of retaliation can prevent them from launching an attack. Additionally, nuclear weapons can provide a sense of prestige and influence on the global stage, enhancing a nation's standing and potentially deterring aggression from other countries. However, it is important to note that this sense of security is based on the assumption that nuclear weapons will not be used and that they can effectively prevent conflicts.