1.
If you answered "no" to question 12, please comment. If "yes", please write "NA".
2.
Please indicate the amount of time it took you watch the presentation and complete the assessment questions.
3.
Which class of medications does not have a compelling indication in the treatment of HTN in a post-MI patient?
Correct Answer
B. Calcium channel blockers
Explanation
Calcium channel blockers do not have a compelling indication in the treatment of hypertension (HTN) in a post-MI (myocardial infarction) patient. This means that calcium channel blockers are not specifically recommended for this particular condition. ACE inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers), beta blockers, and aldosterone antagonists are all classes of medications that are commonly used in the treatment of HTN in post-MI patients.
4.
Which lifestyle modification listed below has the potential to produce the greatest drop in systolic blood pressure?
Correct Answer
D. DASH eating plan
Explanation
All of these interventions are beneficially. However, the DASH eating plan has been found to be the most beneficial.
5.
A 44 yo male patient in your consultation is found to have HTN and a family history of CHD. His 10-year CHD risk is 8%. Above what LDL level should drug therapy be considered?
Correct Answer
C. ≥ 160
Explanation
The patient's risk is
6.
Lovastatin 80 mg daily provides an LDL reduction equivalent to:
Correct Answer
D. Simvastatin 40 mg or Atorvastatin 20 mg
Explanation
Conversions are not always exact but can be useful.
Relative 'strengths' = lovastatin < simvastatin < atorvastatin
7.
Did the presentation meet the following learning objective: Determine a patient's hypertension classification and blood pressure goals
Explanation
Yes. The presentation provided information and guidance on how to determine a patient's hypertension classification and establish blood pressure goals. It likely included explanations of the different hypertension stages, the criteria for classification, and the recommended blood pressure targets for each stage. The presentation may have also discussed the importance of individualized goals based on patient characteristics and comorbidities. Overall, it met the learning objective by equipping the audience with the knowledge and tools needed to determine hypertension classification and establish appropriate blood pressure goals for patients.
8.
Did the presentation meet the following learning objective: Recommend hypertension medications based on patient's compelling indications.
Explanation
Yes. The presentation likely met the learning objective of recommending hypertension medications based on patient's compelling indications. The question does not provide any specific details about the presentation, but based on the given learning objective, if the presentation included information and guidance on how to select and recommend hypertension medications based on the patient's compelling indications, then it can be assumed that the objective was met.
9.
Did the presentation meet the following learning objective: Evaluate the patient's risk factors for CHD and determine FLP goals and appropriate antihyperlipidemic medication.
Explanation
Yes. The presentation successfully evaluated the patient's risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) and determined the goals for the Framingham Lipid Profile (FLP) as well as appropriate antihyperlipidemic medication.
10.
Did the presentation meet the following learning objective: Recommend adherence strategies and lifestyle and diet modifications to successfully manage hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
Explanation
Yes. The presentation likely provided information and recommendations on adherence strategies, lifestyle modifications, and diet modifications to manage hypertension and hyperlipidemia. This would involve educating the audience on the importance of taking medication as prescribed, making healthy lifestyle choices such as exercising regularly and avoiding smoking, and following a balanced diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol. By meeting these learning objectives, the presentation would have provided valuable information on managing these conditions effectively.
11.
How would you rate the ability of the presenter to provide a high-quality educational activity?
Explanation
The presenter is rated as "Very capable" because the presentation was well-done and provided a high-quality educational activity. This implies that the presenter was able to effectively deliver the information and engage the audience, resulting in a valuable educational experience.
12.
How useful were the educational materials?
Explanation
The given correct answer is "Very useful". This suggests that the educational materials provided were highly beneficial and served their purpose effectively. They likely provided valuable information, aided in understanding concepts, and contributed significantly to the learning process.
13.
Learning assessment questions were appropriate
Explanation
The given correct answer is "Yes". This suggests that the learning assessment questions were appropriate. It implies that the questions were relevant, aligned with the learning objectives, and effectively measured the students' understanding and knowledge. The questions likely provided a fair and accurate assessment of the students' learning progress and allowed for meaningful feedback and evaluation.
14.
Was the presenter free of bias?