Legal Studies Quiz - Tort Law | Attempts: 2108

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team

The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.

Learn about Our Editorial Process

| By Legalproject

Legalproject

Community Contributor

Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 2,108

Questions: 6 | Attempts: 2,108 | Updated: Mar 21, 2023

Questions

Settings

Feedback

During the Quiz End of Quiz

Difficulty

Sequential Easy First Hard First

Play as

Quiz Flashcard

Create your own Quiz

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on Pinterest Share on Email Copy to Clipboard Embed on your website

A quiz about legal studies, tort law.

Questions and Answers

1.

What is the type of tort law in McDonald’s Restaurants v. Morris & Steel, 1990?

Explanation
The correct answer is defamation, specifically libel. In the case of McDonald's Restaurants v. Morris & Steel, 1990, the type of tort law involved was defamation, which refers to the act of damaging someone's reputation through false statements. In this case, it was specifically libel, which refers to defamation in written or printed form.

Rate this question:

2
4 0
2.

Case Study:After surgery, a patient realises that a pair of scissors has been left inside them. They decide to sue the hospital they went to for negligence. Who is the plaintiff in the case?
- A.
  
  The hospital
- B.
  
  The patient
Correct Answer
B. The patient

Explanation
The patient is the plaintiff in the case because they are the one filing the lawsuit against the hospital for negligence. As the injured party, they are seeking legal action and compensation for the harm caused by the hospital's negligence in leaving a pair of scissors inside them during surgery.

Rate this question:

0
1
3.

Negligence, defamation and trespass are all kinds of tort law. What is the fourth type?

Correct Answer
Nuisance

Explanation
Negligence, defamation, trespass, and nuisance are all types of tort law. Nuisance refers to a legal concept where an individual's use or enjoyment of their property is interfered with by another party's actions. This interference can be in the form of noise, pollution, or other disturbances that cause inconvenience or harm. Nuisance cases often involve disputes between neighbors or businesses, and the affected party can seek legal remedies to stop or prevent the interference.

Rate this question:

1
4 0
4.

Which of the following is a principle of defamation?
- A.
  
  Duty of care breached
- B.
  
  Statement refers to the plaintiff
- C.
  
  The defendant committed an act/omission which caused inconvenience to the plaintiff
- D.
  
  Absolute Privilege
Correct Answer
B. Statement refers to the plaintiff

Explanation
The principle of defamation states that a statement refers to the plaintiff. Defamation occurs when false information is communicated to a third party, damaging the reputation of the plaintiff. In this case, the statement is directly related to the plaintiff, indicating that it is defamatory.

Rate this question:

0
1
5.

In the case of Anderson, et. al v. PG&E, 1993, who is the defendant?

Correct Answer
PG&E
Pacific Gas and Electric
Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Explanation
The defendant in the case of Anderson, et. al v. PG&E, 1993 is PG&E, which stands for Pacific Gas and Electric.

Rate this question:

4
6.

Case Study:A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
- A.
  
  Remoteness of Damage
- B.
  
  Absolute Privilege
- C.
  
  Legalised by prescription
- D.
  
  Contributory Negligence
- E.
  
  Justification
Correct Answer
D. Contributory Negligence

Explanation
The driver may use the defense of contributory negligence. Contributory negligence is a legal doctrine that states if the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injuries, they may be barred from recovering any damages from the defendant. In this case, the pedestrian crossed the road without looking, which can be seen as negligent behavior. Therefore, the driver can argue that the pedestrian's own negligence contributed to the accident and should be held partially responsible for the injuries.

Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

Current Version
Mar 21, 2023

Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team
Sep 12, 2009

Quiz Created by
Legalproject

Legal Studies Quiz - Tort Law

What is the type of tort law in McDonald’s Restaurants v. Morris & Steel, 1990?

Case Study:After surgery, a patient realises that a pair of scissors has been left inside them. They decide to sue the hospital they went to for negligence. Who is the plaintiff in the case?

Negligence, defamation and trespass are all kinds of tort law. What is the fourth type?

Which of the following is a principle of defamation?

In the case of Anderson, et. al v. PG&E, 1993, who is the defendant?

Case Study:A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?