Module 2: Study Designs

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Drabokamal95
D
Drabokamal95
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 8 | Total Attempts: 3,539
| Attempts: 1,785
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/10 Questions

    7-Case-control studies are useful in rare diseases :

    • True
    • False
Please wait...
About This Quiz

This quiz covers various aspects of study designs in medical research, focusing on literature review, research formulation, evidence hierarchy, and abstract components.

Module 2: Study Designs - Quiz

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    2- "PICO" in formulating research question stands for :

    • A) prognosis, indicator, control, outbreak.

    • B) phenomenon, investigation, consequences, occurrence.

    • C) population, intervention, control, outcome

    • D) none of the above

    Correct Answer
    A. C) population, intervention, control, outcome
    Explanation
    The acronym "PICO" is commonly used in formulating research questions in evidence-based practice. It stands for Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome. This framework helps researchers to clearly define the specific population or group they are studying, the intervention or treatment being investigated, the control group or comparison being used, and the desired outcome or result they are looking for. By using the PICO framework, researchers can develop focused and well-defined research questions that can be effectively studied and answered.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    4- In EBM pyramid, what is more powerful ?

    • A) Case control study

    • B) Cohort study

    • C) Systematic review and meta- analysis

    • D)Editorials

    Correct Answer
    A. C) Systematic review and meta- analysis
    Explanation
    Systematic review and meta-analysis are considered more powerful in the EBM (Evidence-Based Medicine) pyramid because they provide the highest level of evidence. These types of studies involve the comprehensive review and analysis of multiple primary research studies on a specific topic. They aim to synthesize the available evidence and provide a more reliable and robust conclusion. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered to have a higher level of evidence compared to individual observational studies like case-control and cohort studies, as well as opinion-based articles like editorials.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    8-observational studies always lead to detect causality :-

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    Observational studies do not always lead to the detection of causality. While they can provide valuable insights and generate hypotheses, they cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables. Observational studies observe and analyze existing data without manipulating any variables, which limits their ability to determine causation. Other types of studies, such as experimental studies, are better suited for establishing causality as they involve controlled interventions and randomization. Therefore, the given answer "False" is correct.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    6- IN Cohort study of efficacy of drug "X" for Myocardial infarction 

    • A) we follow up patients and observe the case

    • B) we take a history of previous exposure to the MI

    • C) we present a rare syndrome involved in MI

    • D) we systematically collect all Data about drug X

    Correct Answer
    A. A) we follow up patients and observe the case
    Explanation
    In a cohort study of the efficacy of drug "X" for myocardial infarction, the correct answer is A) we follow up patients and observe the case. This means that the study involves tracking and monitoring a group of patients over a period of time to observe the outcomes and effects of drug "X" on myocardial infarction. This type of study allows researchers to gather data on the real-world effectiveness of the drug in a specific population.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    3- Which of the following is higher in Evidence:-

    • A) Interventional studies

    • B) Observational Analytical

    • C) Observational Descriptive

    Correct Answer
    A. A) Interventional studies
    Explanation
    Interventional studies provide the highest level of evidence because they involve manipulating variables and controlling for confounding factors. These studies typically involve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), where participants are randomly assigned to different interventions or treatment groups. This design allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships and draw more definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of a particular intervention. On the other hand, observational studies, both analytical and descriptive, only observe and record data without manipulating variables or controlling for confounding factors, making their evidence less robust.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    5-Paper abstract contains:-

    • A) Methodology and statistics

    • B) Summary of all paper's parts

    • C) Aim of the study

    • D) Background about research topic

    Correct Answer
    A. B) Summary of all paper's parts
    Explanation
    The correct answer is B) Summary of all paper's parts. This means that a paper abstract should provide a concise overview of all the different sections or parts of the paper. It should briefly summarize the introduction, methods, results, and conclusions of the research study. The abstract serves as a snapshot of the entire paper, giving readers a clear understanding of what the study is about and what the main findings are, without going into too much detail.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    10- Disadvantages of Cohort study include all of the following except:

    • Time-consuming

    • Expensive

    • Can establish causal sequence

    • Loss of follow up is high

    Correct Answer
    A. Can establish causal sequence
    Explanation
    The given answer states that "Can establish causal sequence" is not a disadvantage of a cohort study. This means that cohort studies are able to establish a causal sequence, which is a strength rather than a disadvantage. Cohort studies are known for their ability to determine cause and effect relationships between exposures and outcomes over a period of time. However, the other options listed - time-consuming, expensive, and high loss of follow-up - are all considered disadvantages of cohort studies.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    9-Disadvantages of Cross-sectional study include (select all that apply) 

    • Quick

    • Cheap

    • High risk of bias

    • Does not lead to causal sequence

    Correct Answer(s)
    A. High risk of bias
    A. Does not lead to causal sequence
    Explanation
    Cross-sectional studies are a type of observational research that examines a population at a specific point in time. The two disadvantages mentioned in the answer are high risk of bias and the inability to establish a causal sequence. Cross-sectional studies are prone to bias because they do not control for confounding variables or establish a temporal relationship between the exposure and outcome. Additionally, they cannot determine the cause-effect relationship between variables since they only provide a snapshot of data at a single time point.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    1- All of the following are correct according to Literature review except : 

    • A) there is a selection bias

    • B) it has weak evidence

    • C) certain criteria must exist

    • D) Case report is better than it

    Correct Answer
    A. D) Case report is better than it
    Explanation
    The correct answer is D) Case report is better than it. This answer is correct because the statement contradicts the common understanding in literature review that case reports are generally considered to be of lower quality evidence compared to other study designs. Literature reviews typically prioritize higher quality evidence such as systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies over case reports. Therefore, it is incorrect to state that case reports are better than other types of evidence in a literature review.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 20, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Oct 15, 2016
    Quiz Created by
    Drabokamal95
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.