Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris Pas I
Questions and Answers
- 1.
National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam? People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system. Whoever there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester. In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.The text is about ....
- A.
The process of the national exam
- B.
The story of the national exam
- C.
The pros and cons about the national exam
- D.
The description about the national exam
- E.
The information about the national exam
Correct Answer
C. The pros and cons about the national examExplanation
The text discusses the pros and cons of the national exam in Indonesia. It mentions that there are debates about whether the quality of education depends on the national exam and whether the Indonesian system will worsen without it. Some people argue that the national exam is necessary to maintain the quality of education, while others believe that it is not the sole determinant of education quality and only measures a small portion of students' competence. Therefore, the correct answer is "The pros and cons about the national exam."Rate this question:
-
- 2.
Text National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam? People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system. Whoever there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester. In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.The text is about ....
- A.
To evaluate how the result of the teaching
- B.
To evaluate the students’ skill in several subjects
- C.
To detect the students’ competence in all subjects
- D.
To evaluate the students’ capability in several subjects
- E.
To detect the students’ ability in studying the school’s subject
Correct Answer
D. To evaluate the students’ capability in several subjectsExplanation
The correct answer is "To evaluate the students’ capability in several subjects." The text discusses the controversy surrounding the national exams in Indonesia and presents arguments from both sides. Those who support the national exam argue that it is necessary to maintain the quality of the education system, while those against it believe that the quality of education should not solely depend on the national exam. However, it is mentioned that the national exam can still be useful in evaluating students' competence in several subjects on a national scale. Therefore, the text suggests that one of the purposes of the national exam is to evaluate students' capability in several subjects.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
Text National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam? People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system. Whoever there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester. In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.“Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects,...”.The antonym of the underlined word is ....
- A.
Ability
- B.
Attitude
- C.
Disability
- D.
Capability
- E.
Compilation
Correct Answer
C. DisabilityExplanation
The antonym of the underlined word "competence" is "disability". The passage discusses the national exam and its role in evaluating students' competence in specific subjects. The antonym "disability" implies a lack of competence or ability in a particular area. Therefore, it is the correct answer choice.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Text People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents. To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture. Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people. On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.The best title for the text is ....
- A.
The wood
- B.
Wood furniture
- C.
Trees for woods
- D.
The wood industry
- E.
Cutting down the trees
Correct Answer
D. The wood industryExplanation
The best title for the text is "The wood industry" because the passage discusses the arguments used by the wood industry to support the practice of cutting down trees. It also mentions the opponents of the wood industry and their concerns about the negative impact on the environment. Therefore, the passage primarily focuses on the wood industry and its stance on cutting down trees.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Text People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents. To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture. Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people. On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.The purpose of the writer in writing the text is ....
- A.
To describe the wood industry
- B.
To share an amusing event to others
- C.
To inform the readers about the news
- D.
To persuade the readers to read the article
- E.
To presents two points of view about an issue
Correct Answer
E. To presents two points of view about an issueExplanation
The purpose of the writer in writing the text is to present two points of view about the issue of cutting down trees in the wood industry. The writer discusses the arguments used by the wood industry to support their practice and then presents the arguments of opponents who believe that cutting down trees should be banned. The writer aims to provide a balanced view by presenting both sides of the argument and allowing readers to consider the different perspectives on the issue.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Text People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents. To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture. Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people. On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.Which statement is in line with the writer’s opinion ?
- A.
The cutting down of the trees should continue
- B.
The cutting down of the trees should be banned
- C.
Wood is used by by million people to build houses
- D.
Wood is natural material for housing and furniture
- E.
The cutting down of trees leads to heat in dry season
Correct Answer
B. The cutting down of the trees should be bannedExplanation
The writer's opinion is in line with the statement "The cutting down of the trees should be banned." This is evident from the last sentence of the passage where the writer states that despite the necessity of wood for building and furniture, humans should learn to share the earth with other living things and not just exploit them. This indicates that the writer believes that the practice of cutting down trees should be stopped.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Text People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents. To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture. Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people. On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.the advantage of wood according to the wood industry, except....
- A.
To build
- B.
To make furniture
- C.
To replace other material
- D.
To provide jobs for many people
- E.
To reduce unemployment in rural areas
Correct Answer
C. To replace other materialExplanation
The correct answer is "to replace other material." This is because opponents of the wood industry argue that there are many different kinds of materials available that can be used instead of cutting down trees for wood. They believe that it is no longer necessary or justified to continue this practice, as it has negative environmental impacts. Therefore, the idea of using wood as a replacement for other materials is in line with the arguments made by opponents of the wood industry.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Text People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents. To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture. Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people. On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them."on balance, I believe that the cutting down of the trees should banned". the underlined word means....
- A.
Permitted
- B.
Advised
- C.
Allowed
- D.
Prohibited
- E.
Recommended
Correct Answer
D. ProhibitedExplanation
The word "prohibited" means not allowed or forbidden. In the given context, the author states that they believe cutting down trees should be banned. Therefore, the correct answer is "prohibited" because it aligns with the author's opinion that the practice should not be allowed.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
Text ADOPTION Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not. Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child. But there are couples who cannot have children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked. State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names. On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right. On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her. Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally.An adoptive child has no right ....
- A.
To receive inheritance
- B.
To get adequate love and care
- C.
To know his/her adoption records
- D.
To live with his/her natural parents
- E.
To be well treated as member of a family
Correct Answer
D. To live with his/her natural parentsExplanation
An adoptive child has no right to live with his/her natural parents. Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or her as a member of their family. By law, the adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. This means that the adoptive child does not have the right to live with his/her natural parents, as they have been replaced by the adoptive family.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Text ADOPTION Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not. Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child. But there are couples who cannot have children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked. State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names. On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right. On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her. Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally. Which of the following is the reason why parents place their child up for adoption ?
- A.
He or she is from a poor family
- B.
His or her parents do not love them
- C.
His or her parents are not in good health
- D.
His or her parents does not want to raise him/her
- E.
His or her parents can not afford to give a good education
Correct Answer
E. His or her parents can not afford to give a good educationExplanation
Some parents place their child up for adoption because they feel they cannot adequately care for their offspring due to economic conditions. They may not have the financial means to provide a good education for their child, which is why they choose adoption as a way to give their child a better future in terms of education.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
Text ADOPTION Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not. Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child. But there are couples who cannot have children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked. State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names. On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right. On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her. Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally.The writer's purpose in writing the text is ....
- A.
To tell readers how to adopt a child
- B.
To describe people who adopt the child
- C.
To explain to readers how an adopted child raised
- D.
To persuade people to have a foster or to adopt a child
- E.
To inform readers the reason and problems of adopting a child
Correct Answer
E. To inform readers the reason and problems of adopting a childExplanation
The correct answer is to inform readers the reason and problems of adopting a child. The passage discusses the process of adoption, the reasons why parents place their children up for adoption, the laws surrounding adoption, and the arguments for and against disclosing adoption records. The passage aims to provide information about the reasons and problems associated with adopting a child.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
Text ADOPTION Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not. Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child. But there are couples who cannot have children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked. State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names. On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right. On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her. Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally. Which of the following is the most improbable reason why adopted children want to have or know their adopted records ?
- A.
They want to know their natural parents
- B.
They want to know why they are adopted
- C.
They want to know their status in adoptive parents
- D.
They want to pay back their adoptive parents expenditure
- E.
They want to know why their parents place them up for adoption
Correct Answer
D. They want to pay back their adoptive parents expenditureExplanation
Adopted children wanting to pay back their adoptive parents' expenditure is the most improbable reason why they would want to have or know their adoption records. This is because adoption is a legal process where the adoptive parents willingly take on the financial responsibility of raising the child as their own. It is not expected or necessary for the adopted child to pay back any expenses incurred by their adoptive parents.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
A : “I can’t find my mobile phone in my bag.”B : “Well, you ..... it in the car. Let’s take a look.”
- A.
Must leave
- B.
Should leave
- C.
Might have left
- D.
Should have leave
- E.
Had better leave
Correct Answer
C. Might have leftExplanation
B suggests that A might have left their mobile phone in the car. This implies that B thinks it is a possibility or a potential explanation for why A can't find their phone.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Rani : Why do you look so sad ?Dina : I got 5 for my English testRani : .......
- A.
You may prepare it
- B.
You have studied hard
- C.
You must have studied hard
- D.
You should have studied hard
- E.
You might have studied hard
Correct Answer
D. You should have studied hardExplanation
The correct answer suggests that Rani is expressing her opinion on what Dina should have done in order to get a better grade on her English test. Rani is implying that Dina's sadness is a result of not putting enough effort into studying for the test.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
Paul : None of the passengers saved in the car accident yesterday.Andi : It ..... a very terrific accident.
- A.
Must be
- B.
Should be
- C.
Must have been
- D.
Ought to have been
- E.
Would have been
Correct Answer
C. Must have beenExplanation
Andi is using the modal verb "must have been" to express a strong belief or assumption about the accident. The phrase suggests that Andi is confident that the accident was indeed very terrifying based on the fact that none of the passengers survived.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
Cory : Mom, it didn’t take a long time for preparing dinner today.Mother: It ..... longer to get dinner made without your help.
- A.
Should have taken
- B.
Would have taken
- C.
Have taken
- D.
Would take
- E.
Could take
Correct Answer
B. Would have takenExplanation
The mother is responding to Cory's statement about dinner not taking a long time. She is implying that if Cory had not helped, it would have taken longer to prepare dinner. Therefore, the correct answer is "would have taken."Rate this question:
-
- 17.
Andri : She didn’t answer when I knocked on the door. She ...... sleeping.
- A.
Must
- B.
May be
- C.
Can be
- D.
May have been
- E.
Might have been
Correct Answer
E. Might have beenExplanation
The correct answer is "might have been." This is because Andri is uncertain about the reason why the person didn't answer the door. By using "might have been," it suggests the possibility that the person was sleeping, but it is not confirmed.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
Nita : Will he pay all his debt ?Dita : Yes, if he .... the inheritance.
- A.
Got
- B.
Gets
- C.
Is gotten
- D.
Had gotten
- E.
Would get
Correct Answer
B. GetsExplanation
The correct answer is "gets." This is because the sentence is in the present tense and "gets" is the correct present tense form of the verb "get." It indicates that if he receives the inheritance, he will pay all his debt.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
A:”What would you do if you were a Millionaire ?”B: “... a trip around the world.
- A.
I took
- B.
I will take
- C.
I would take
- D.
I will have taken
- E.
I would have taken
Correct Answer
C. I would takeExplanation
The correct answer is "I would take." This is because the question is asking about a hypothetical situation of being a millionaire. The phrase "I would take" indicates a conditional response, suggesting that if the person were a millionaire, they would choose to take a trip around the world.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
If we go to the top , we will have a nice view of Jakarta.This sentence means ....
- A.
We saw Jakarta last month
- B.
We have already seen Jakarta from the top
- C.
We are now looking and having a nice of Jakarta
- D.
There is possibility of seeing Jakarta from the top
- E.
There isn’t any possibility of seeing Jakarta from the top
Correct Answer
D. There is possibility of seeing Jakarta from the topExplanation
The correct answer suggests that if we go to the top, there is a possibility of seeing Jakarta. This means that it is likely that we will have a nice view of Jakarta if we go to a higher location.Rate this question:
-
- 21.
X: How is your boss ? Did he sold his stock in the company ?Y: My boss would make a lot of money if he had sold his stock in the company earlier.X: What do you mean ?Y: ....
- A.
My boss made a lot of money because he sold his stock earlier
- B.
My boss made a lot of money though he didn’t sell his stock earlier
- C.
My boss didn’t make a lot of money though he sold his stock earlier
- D.
My boss he sold his stock earlier so he would make a lot of money
- E.
My boss doesn’t sell his stock earlier so he doesn’t make a lot of money
Correct Answer
E. My boss doesn’t sell his stock earlier so he doesn’t make a lot of money -
- 22.
Reni : “If I had known it was very interesting, I ... it.”
- A.
Would buy
- B.
Won't buy
- C.
Will have bought
- D.
Would have bought
- E.
Would never have bought
Correct Answer
D. Would have boughtExplanation
Reni is expressing regret about not knowing that something was very interesting. The phrase "If I had known" indicates a hypothetical situation in the past. The phrase "would have bought" suggests that Reni would have made the purchase if she had known it was interesting.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
Aldi : “Did you meet your brother yesterday ?”Reno: “No, I didn’t. If I had come earlier, I would have meet him.”This sentence means ....
- A.
I came late , so I would not meet him
- B.
I came early so that I would meet him
- C.
I came early, therefore I would not meet him.
- D.
Although I came early, I would not meet him
- E.
I did not come late; nevertheless I would not meet him
Correct Answer
A. I came late , so I would not meet himExplanation
The correct answer suggests that Reno came late, which is why he did not meet his brother. The phrase "If I had come earlier, I would have met him" implies that Reno's lateness caused him to miss the opportunity to meet his brother.Rate this question:
-
- 24.
Anna : How is the novel that I borrowed to you ?Wina : It was such ... that I read it in one sitting.
- A.
Interested
- B.
Interesting
- C.
Interestingly
- D.
An interested story
- E.
An interesting story
Correct Answer
E. An interesting storyExplanation
Wina's response indicates that the novel was captivating and engrossing, as she was able to read it in one sitting. This suggests that the story itself was interesting and held her attention throughout.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
Father : How was your first day of the English course ?Nisma : It was so ... that I have already got many friends easily.
- A.
Excite
- B.
Excited
- C.
Exciting
- D.
An excited day
- E.
An excitingday
Correct Answer
C. ExcitingExplanation
Nisma describes her first day of the English course as "exciting" because she has already made many friends easily. This suggests that she had a positive and enjoyable experience, which is why she uses the adjective "exciting" to describe the day.Rate this question:
-
- 26.
Mike : Look at the boy !Wawan : You mean the boy who asked such ... that everybody stare at him.
- A.
A challenging question
- B.
A challenge question
- C.
Challenging
- D.
Challenge
- E.
Challent
Correct Answer
A. A challenging questionExplanation
The correct answer is "a challenging question". Mike and Wawan are discussing a boy who asked a question that caught everyone's attention and made people stare at him. The word "challenging" implies that the question was difficult or thought-provoking, which is why it drew so much attention.Rate this question:
-
- 27.
X: It is difficult to find kerosene nowadays.Y: Yes, kerosene is ... expensive that many people complain about it.
- A.
Enough
- B.
Too
- C.
Very
- D.
Such
- E.
So
Correct Answer
E. SoExplanation
The correct answer is "so". In the given conversation, Y agrees with X's statement about the difficulty of finding kerosene by saying that it is "so" expensive that many people complain about it. The word "so" is used to indicate a high degree or intensity, emphasizing the expensive nature of kerosene.Rate this question:
-
- 28.
Merry : Bram, have you seen Winda ?Bram : you mean Winda ... you talked to this mornig
- A.
Whose
- B.
Where
- C.
Whom
- D.
Which
- E.
Who
Correct Answer
C. WhomExplanation
The correct answer is "whom." In the conversation, Merry is asking Bram if he has seen Winda. Bram responds by saying "you mean Winda ... you talked to this morning." Bram is referring to the person that Merry had a conversation with earlier, so the appropriate pronoun to use is "whom."Rate this question:
-
- 29.
Restu : Do you know “Zombie Cafe?” A lot of friends are talking about it these days.Gina : sure, I know it. it is a nice place ... we can enjoy some live music while having meals.
- A.
Whom
- B.
Which
- C.
Where
- D.
What
- E.
That
Correct Answer
C. WhereExplanation
The correct answer is "where". The question asks for the word that best fits in the context of Restu and Gina discussing "Zombie Cafe". Restu mentions that a lot of friends are talking about it, implying that it is a place. Gina confirms this by saying "sure, I know it. it is a nice place ... we can enjoy some live music while having meals." Therefore, the word "where" is the most appropriate choice to refer to the location of Zombie Cafe.Rate this question:
-
- 30.
Thomas : Do you know the woman standing there ?Dian : Yes, she is the new English teacher ....
- A.
Which can speak Dutch
- B.
Whose her son is a student at LIA
- C.
Who is also the computer teacher
- D.
Whose husband he died last year
- E.
Whom also the computer teacher
Correct Answer
C. Who is also the computer teacherExplanation
The correct answer is "who is also the computer teacher." This answer correctly identifies that the woman is not only the new English teacher but also the computer teacher.Rate this question:
-
- 31.
X: You read a book was the book interesting ?Y: Yes, ....
- A.
The book which I read was interesting
- B.
I read which the book was interesting
- C.
The book was interesting which I read
- D.
I read was the interesting which book
- E.
E. I read which was interesting the book E. I read which was interesting the book E. I read which was interesting the book E. I read which was interesting the book I read which was interesting the book
Correct Answer
A. The book which I read was interesting -
- 32.
Leni :”Dinda is late.”Alma : “Please tell me ...”
- A.
Why was she late
- B.
Why she was late
- C.
Why did she come late
- D.
Why had se come late
- E.
Why would she coma late
Correct Answer
B. Why she was lateExplanation
The correct answer is "why she was late". This is the correct question structure to ask for an explanation of the reason behind Dinda's lateness. The other options have grammatical errors or incorrect verb tenses.Rate this question:
-
- 33.
Edo : Is that the woman ... owns the store ?Ati : Yes, that's true
- A.
Husband
- B.
The husband
- C.
Who her husband
- D.
Which her husband
- E.
Whose husband
Correct Answer
E. Whose husbandExplanation
The correct answer is "whose husband". In the conversation, Edo is asking about the woman who owns the store. Ati confirms that it is true, implying that the woman owns the store because of her husband. The phrase "whose husband" indicates possession, suggesting that the woman's ownership of the store is connected to her husband.Rate this question:
-
- 34.
Rahmat : Have you seen Aldo ?Refi : I haven't seen him...he left this morning.
- A.
Where
- B.
Which
- C.
Since
- D.
Why
- E.
How
Correct Answer
C. SinceExplanation
The correct answer is "since". This is because Refi is explaining that they haven't seen Aldo because he left in the morning. The word "since" indicates a cause and effect relationship, implying that Aldo's departure in the morning is the reason why Refi hasn't seen him.Rate this question:
-
- 35.
The man is an actor. Nina introduced him to me.We can say :” The man ... Nina introduced to me is an actor.”
- A.
Whose
- B.
Whom
- C.
Where
- D.
Which
- E.
Who
Correct Answer
B. WhomExplanation
The correct answer is "whom". In this sentence, "Nina introduced him to me" is a dependent clause that provides additional information about the man. The pronoun "whom" is used to refer to the object of the verb "introduced", which is the man. Therefore, "The man whom Nina introduced to me is an actor" is the correct way to rephrase the sentence.Rate this question:
-
- 36.
Nani : Ida, I think this purple skirt suit you well.Ida : ....
- A.
But it is expensive enough for me
- B.
It is enough expensive for me
- C.
But it is enough for me too
- D.
I don’t think you like it too
- E.
But it is expensive too
Correct Answer
A. But it is expensive enough for meExplanation
Ida is responding to Nani's comment about the purple skirt. She agrees with Nani that the skirt looks good on her, but also mentions that it is expensive. This suggests that Ida likes the skirt but is hesitant to purchase it due to the high price.Rate this question:
-
- 37.
Lina :Mr. Salim’s family is not rich ... they are happy.Luna: I agree with you
- A.
While
- B.
In case
- C.
Moreover
- D.
Nevertheless
- E.
Consequently
Correct Answer
D. NeverthelessExplanation
The given conversation suggests that Mr. Salim's family is not wealthy, but despite their financial situation, they are still happy. The word "nevertheless" is used to indicate a contrast or contradiction between two ideas. In this case, it highlights the fact that despite not being rich, Mr. Salim's family is still content and happy.Rate this question:
-
- 38.
Arif : I didn’t see your car yesterday. Surya : I sold my car .... it was very old
- A.
If
- B.
When
- C.
While
- D.
Because
- E.
Although
Correct Answer
D. BecauseExplanation
Surya sold his car because it was very old. This implies that the reason for selling the car was its age and condition.Rate this question:
-
- 39.
Ani : Where did you buy the books ?Dea: I bought the books in the bookstore near my house... I thought the shop assistant was
- A.
But
- B.
Yet
- C.
While
- D.
Although
- E.
In spite of
Correct Answer
D. AlthoughExplanation
The correct answer is "although". This conjunction is used to show a contrast or contradiction between two ideas. In this case, the speaker bought the books in the bookstore near their house, but they had a different expectation or experience with the shop assistant. The use of "although" indicates that despite buying the books in the store, something unexpected or negative happened with the shop assistant.Rate this question:
-
- 40.
Rika : what did TV reports do ?Tessy : ...the great inconvenience of Travelling, many TV reports went the flooded area for their report.
- A.
Despite
- B.
Although
- C.
In case of
- D.
Because of
- E.
In addition to
Correct Answer
A. DespiteExplanation
Despite the great inconvenience of traveling, many TV reports went to the flooded area for their report. This means that despite the difficulties and challenges involved in traveling, the TV reports still chose to go to the flooded area. The word "despite" indicates that there was a contradiction or contrast between the inconvenience and the actions of the TV reports.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 21, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Nov 28, 2016Quiz Created by
Olawahab
Sekolah Global Mandiri - Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia
Sekolah Global Mandiri - Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia
Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Poltekkes Hermina Tahun 2020
Seleksi Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Poltekkes Hermina Tahun 2020
Back to top