Chapter 5 And 6 Homework

An import quota refers to a limit imposed on the amount of goods that can be imported within a specific timeframe. This restriction aims to control and regulate the volume of foreign products entering a country's market. By implementing import quotas, governments can protect domestic industries, promote local production, and manage the balance of trade. Therefore, the statement "An import quota is a physical restriction on the quantity of goods that may be imported during a specified time period" is true.

This statement is true because a global import quota only sets a limit on the quantity of goods that can be imported each year, without specifying the source or the importers. This means that as long as the quantity limit is not exceeded, the goods can be imported from any country and by any permitted importer.

Local content laws are regulations that require a certain percentage of goods or services to be produced domestically. By implementing such laws, countries aim to promote domestic industries and protect local jobs. By limiting foreign sourcing, these laws ensure that a certain portion of production remains within the country, thus preserving jobs for domestic workers. Therefore, the statement that local content laws are viewed as a means of jobs preservation for domestic workers is true.

The Smoot-Hawley Act, passed in 1930, increased average tariffs on protected imports in the United States to over 50 percent. This legislation aimed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition during the Great Depression. The higher tariffs were intended to make imported goods more expensive, encouraging consumers to buy domestically produced goods instead. This act is often criticized for exacerbating the global economic downturn by triggering retaliatory tariffs from other countries and reducing international trade.

An import quota refers to a maximum limit set by a country on the quantity of a foreign-produced good that can be imported within a specific time frame. This measure is used to restrict the amount of foreign goods entering the domestic market, protecting domestic industries from competition and promoting local production. By imposing import quotas, governments can control the supply of foreign goods, regulate trade, and safeguard domestic industries from being overwhelmed by foreign competition.

The correct answer suggests that South Koreans are selling VCRs in the United States below their production cost. This implies that they are selling the VCRs at a price that is lower than what it costs them to produce the VCRs. This could be due to various reasons such as overproduction, a desire to enter the US market at any cost, or a strategy to drive out competitors. Regardless of the specific reason, the answer indicates that the selling price is lower than the production cost, resulting in a loss for the South Koreans.

The practice described in the question, where Japanese employers sell goods in overseas markets at prices well below those in Japan to avoid losses, is known as dumping. Dumping is when a company exports goods at a price lower than their production cost or the price they are sold in the domestic market, which can harm the domestic industries of the importing country.

With free trade, Mexico's consumer surplus increases to $3200 because they can now access goods at a lower price than before. Producer surplus, on the other hand, decreases to $200 because domestic producers face competition from foreign producers who can offer goods at a lower cost. This leads to a decrease in their profits.

The subsidy provided by the Mexican government to its steel producers decreases the cost of production for the producers. As a result, the supply of steel increases, leading to a surplus in the domestic market. To eliminate this surplus, the excess steel is exported, resulting in an increase in imports. Therefore, the quantity of imports equals 4 tons.

Trade adjustment assistance reflects the notion that if society enjoys gains due to increased efficiency stemming from trade liberalization, some sort of compensation should be provided to those who are temporarily hurt by import competition. This policy aims to help individuals and communities that have been negatively affected by imports by providing them with financial support, job training, and other forms of assistance to help them adjust to the changes in the economy.

Domestic workers lobbying for import restrictions would exert the strongest political pressure for a trade policy that results in higher protectionism. This is because import restrictions would limit foreign competition, allowing domestic industries to flourish and protect domestic jobs. By advocating for import restrictions, domestic workers aim to safeguard their employment opportunities and job security, thereby pressuring policymakers to adopt protectionist trade policies.

The correct answer is 5 percent of the value of imports. This means that on average, the United States charges a tariff rate of 5 percent on dutiable imports. Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, and they are usually calculated as a percentage of the value of the goods. Therefore, the average tariff rate today in the United States is approximately 5 percent of the value of imports.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the international organization that stipulates procedures for the settlement of international trade disputes. It provides a platform for member countries to negotiate and resolve trade-related issues through its dispute settlement mechanism. The WTO plays a crucial role in ensuring the smooth functioning of global trade by promoting and enforcing rules and regulations that govern international trade. Its dispute settlement procedures help to maintain a fair and level playing field for all member countries, ensuring that trade disputes are resolved in a transparent and impartial manner.

When a tariff is imposed on imported steel for the home country, it leads to higher steel prices. This is because the tariff increases the cost of imported steel, making it more expensive for consumers. As a result, the demand for steel decreases, leading to falling steel consumption. This can have negative effects on domestic steel companies, as lower consumption means lower sales and potentially lower profits. Additionally, if the steel companies are unable to compete with the higher-priced imported steel, it could lead to higher unemployment for domestic steel workers.

The explanation for the given correct answer is that members of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and its successor, the World Trade Organization, do indeed agree to the principle of nondiscrimination in trade and the reduction of trade barriers through multilateral negotiations. This means that they commit to treating all trading partners equally and not imposing unfair trade barriers or discriminatory practices.

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. It is not limited to rare books and pieces of art, but also includes patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Therefore, the statement that intellectual property refers to holdings of rare books and pieces of art is false.

Copyrights, trademarks, and patents are indeed used to protect the intellectual property of a nation from foreign imitators. These legal mechanisms grant exclusive rights to creators and inventors, allowing them to control and profit from their creations or inventions. Copyrights protect original works of authorship, such as books, music, and software. Trademarks protect brands and logos, ensuring that consumers can identify and differentiate products or services. Patents protect inventions, granting inventors the exclusive right to produce, use, and sell their inventions for a limited period of time. These protections are crucial in fostering innovation and encouraging creativity in a country.

Import quotas can indeed yield revenue for the domestic government if they choose to auction import licenses to the highest bidder in a competitive market. By doing so, the government can generate additional income from the sale of these licenses, which can contribute to the overall revenue of the government. This approach ensures that the import licenses are allocated to those who value them the most, as they are willing to pay the highest price for them in the auction.

When import licenses are auctioned off to domestic importers in a competitive market, the scarcity value or revenue effect of these licenses accrues to the domestic government. This means that the government receives the additional revenue generated from the auctioning of these licenses. This revenue can then be used by the government for various purposes such as funding public projects, reducing the budget deficit, or investing in social programs.

When the home country's government grants a subsidy on a domestically produced good, domestic producers tend to increase their level of production. This is because the subsidy lowers the production costs for domestic producers, making it more profitable for them to produce more goods. By increasing their level of production, domestic producers can take advantage of the subsidy and maximize their profits. Therefore, the correct answer is to increase their level of production.

The apparent justification for the policy of levying quotas on inexpensive oil imported from the Middle East is that one should not be too dependent on foreign suppliers of crucial resources. By implementing quotas, the U.S. government aims to reduce its reliance on foreign oil and ensure a more secure and stable domestic supply. This justification prioritizes national security and self-sufficiency in the energy sector over lower prices for consumers.

A local content requirement is a trade restriction that stipulates the percentage of a product's total value that must be produced domestically in order for that product to be sold domestically. It is a policy implemented by governments to promote domestic production and protect local industries. This requirement ensures that a certain portion of the product's value is contributed by local manufacturers, which helps to stimulate the domestic economy and create job opportunities.

The correct answer is reductions in trade barriers via multilateral negotiations. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have worked towards reducing trade barriers such as import tariffs and export subsidies through negotiations among member countries. These agreements aim to promote free and fair trade by facilitating the removal of barriers that hinder the flow of goods and services across borders. Through multilateral negotiations, countries have been able to reach agreements on lowering trade barriers, thereby promoting international trade and economic growth.

The correct answer is export subsidy. The Export-Import Bank of the United States provides loans and loan guarantees to foreign purchasers of American goods, which encourages American firms to sell their products overseas. This financial support is specifically aimed at promoting and supporting exports, making it an export subsidy.

Countervailing duties are imposed on imported goods to offset the advantage that foreign exporters may have due to subsidies provided by their government. Subsidies can lower the production costs for foreign producers, allowing them to sell their goods at lower prices compared to domestic producers. By imposing countervailing duties, the government aims to level the playing field and prevent unfair competition that could harm domestic industries.

The correct answer is "Decreased" because over the post-World War II era, there has been a global trend towards reducing trade barriers and promoting free trade. This has been achieved through the establishment of organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the signing of various trade agreements, which have resulted in the lowering of tariffs and other trade barriers between countries. As a result, the importance of tariffs as a trade barrier has decreased over time.

Trade-remedy laws are designed to create a fair and free-trading environment by addressing unfair trade practices and providing remedies for industries affected by them. These laws aim to protect domestic industries from unfair competition, such as dumping or subsidies, by imposing tariffs or quotas on imports. By doing so, trade-remedy laws help to level the playing field and ensure that all countries can compete on equal terms, promoting a more balanced and competitive global trading system.

The correct answer is "Escape clause if rising imports substantially injure the U.S. radio industry." This is because the escape clause allows for temporary relief from trade agreements if a domestic industry is being significantly harmed by increased imports. In this case, if the president lowers tariffs on radios and it leads to a surge in imports that causes substantial harm to the U.S. radio industry, the industry can appeal for relief under the escape clause.

Over the past four decades, there has been a shift in the importance of nontariff barriers (NTBs) and tariffs. NTBs, which are trade barriers other than tariffs, have become more significant, while tariffs have become less important. This suggests that countries have increasingly relied on measures such as quotas, licensing requirements, and technical regulations to restrict trade, rather than using tariffs. This shift may be due to various factors, including changes in global trade patterns, the growth of multinational corporations, and the increasing complexity of international trade regulations.

The correct answer is Doha Round. The Doha Round refers to the most recent round of multilateral trade negotiations that took place between 2001 and 2008. It was launched in Doha, Qatar, and aimed to address various issues related to international trade, including agriculture, services, intellectual property rights, and market access. However, the negotiations faced significant challenges and were not able to reach a comprehensive agreement, leading to a stalemate. Despite this, some partial agreements were reached in areas such as trade facilitation.

Based on the given information, ABC Inc. sells a total of 27 calculators. The question asks for the number of calculators sold in Canada and France, as well as the revenues generated from those sales. The answer "21, $105, 6, $30" indicates that ABC Inc. sells 21 calculators in Canada, generating $105 in revenue, and 6 calculators in France, generating $30 in revenue.

The Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930 was a protectionist trade policy implemented by the United States during the Great Depression. Proponents of the act believed that by raising tariffs on imported goods, it would protect domestic industries and stimulate the economy, thus reducing unemployment. They argued that by making foreign goods more expensive, consumers would be more likely to buy domestically produced goods, leading to increased demand and job creation. However, many economists argue that the act actually worsened the Great Depression by triggering retaliatory tariffs from other countries and reducing international trade.

The statement is false because the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO), have members from both developing and developed countries. The GATT/WTO is an international organization that aims to promote free trade and reduce trade barriers among its member countries. It includes countries from all stages of development, not just developing countries. Developed countries such as the United States, Japan, and European Union member states are also members of the GATT/WTO.

The fast-track provision of U.S. trade law allows the President to negotiate trade agreements with foreign governments more quickly. This means that the normal timetable for negotiations is expedited, allowing for faster decision-making and implementation of trade agreements.

If the foreign demand is elastic in response to the price reduction, it means that a decrease in price will lead to a proportionally larger increase in quantity demanded. In this case, the government subsidy allowing export firms to lower prices would result in a significant increase in demand for their goods, leading to a rise in export revenue.

A producer successfully practicing international dumping would charge a relatively higher price in the more inelastic market. This is because in a more inelastic market, the demand for the product is less responsive to price changes. Therefore, the producer can charge a higher price without losing a significant number of customers. By doing so, the producer can maximize their profits in the more inelastic market while still remaining competitive in the more elastic markets by charging a lower price.

An import quota does not necessarily reduce the overall welfare of the importing nation by an amount equal to the protective effect, consumption effect, and the portion of the revenue effect that is captured by the domestic government. The overall welfare impact of an import quota depends on various factors such as the specific market conditions, the efficiency of domestic producers, and the potential gains from international trade. Therefore, the statement is false.

The elimination of nontariff barriers on apples, such as regulations or restrictions, would make it easier for apples to be imported into a country. This increased import of apples would likely lead to a reduction in profits for domestic apple producers who now face more competition. Additionally, the increased imports may result in job losses for domestic apple workers as the demand for their labor decreases. Therefore, it can be inferred that the statement is true.

Local content laws are regulations that require a certain percentage of goods or services to be produced domestically rather than imported. These laws are based on the principle of import substitution, which aims to promote domestic industries and reduce reliance on foreign goods. By encouraging domestic production, local content laws can boost the economy, create jobs, and reduce trade imbalances. Therefore, the statement that local content laws are consistent with the principle of import substitution is true.

The correct answer is "Lesser its initial dependence on foreign products." When a country has a higher dependence on foreign products, trade embargoes will have a larger impact on its consumer surplus. In this case, if Iraq had a lesser initial dependence on foreign products, the trade embargoes would induce smaller losses in its consumer surplus. This is because Iraq would have alternative suppliers or domestic production to rely on, reducing the negative impact of the embargoes.

Section 301 cases in U.S. trade law deal with allegations of unfair trade practices by foreign nations. This means that these cases involve situations where foreign countries are engaging in practices that are considered unfair or harmful to U.S. businesses or industries. These practices could include things like intellectual property theft, discriminatory trade policies, or subsidies that give foreign companies an unfair advantage in the market. Section 301 allows the U.S. government to take action, such as imposing tariffs or other trade barriers, to address these unfair practices and protect U.S. interests.

The Commodity Credit Corporation is indeed responsible for providing export credit financing for U.S. agricultural exports. This means that they offer financial support to facilitate the export of agricultural products from the United States.

Foreign firms may absorb the tariff by offering exports at lower prices. This means that when a tariff is imposed, foreign firms may choose to lower their prices in order to remain competitive in the home market. This can reduce the level of protection provided to home producers, as the lower prices offered by foreign firms may still attract consumers away from domestic producers. In contrast, an import quota restricts the quantity of imports allowed into the country, which can result in higher prices for the imported good and provide more certainty and protection for home producers.

The statement is true because U.S. antidumping duties are designed to address unfair trade practices where foreign companies sell their products in the United States at prices below their average total cost or lower than the prices charged in their home market. These duties aim to protect domestic industries from the negative effects of such dumping practices by making imported goods more expensive and leveling the playing field for American businesses.

The total cost of the subsidy to the Mexican government equals $800. This is because the subsidy is provided per ton of steel produced, and the supply schedule SM (with subsidy) indicates that the subsidy is $200 per ton. Therefore, if the government provides the subsidy for every ton of steel produced, and considering the given figure, the total cost of the subsidy would be $200 * 4 tons = $800.

The U.S. has a competitive advantage in producing calculators, not steel. Therefore, if import quotas on steel are lowered, it is least likely that there would be rising levels of producer surplus for American steelmakers. This is because the U.S. does not have a comparative advantage in steel production, so lowering import quotas would likely result in increased competition from foreign steel producers, leading to a decrease in producer surplus for American steelmakers.

Dumping refers to the practice of selling products in a foreign market at a lower price than in the domestic market. In this case, Canadian firms are dumping their products in Sweden. This situation favors Swedish consumers over Canadian consumers because they can purchase the products at a lower price. On the other hand, Canadian consumers may face higher prices for the same products in their own market. Therefore, the practice of dumping creates an imbalance in favor of Swedish consumers, leading to an advantage for them over Canadian consumers.

When a local content requirement is imposed, firms are obligated to produce goods or services in a specific country, even if it is a high-cost nation. This means that firms may have to incur higher production costs, which can result in an increase in the price of the product. As a result, consumers have to pay more for the product, leading to a decrease in consumer surplus. Therefore, the statement that product price rises and consumer surplus falls is true.

Export subsidies levied by foreign governments on products in which the United States has a comparative disadvantage lead to increases in U.S. consumer surplus. This is because these subsidies make the imported products cheaper for U.S. consumers, allowing them to purchase more of these products at a lower price. As a result, consumers benefit from a larger consumer surplus, which is the difference between the price consumers are willing to pay for a product and the actual price they pay.

The correct answer is "Domestic producers of the imported good being harmed". This is because when a maximum amount of a foreign produced good is allowed to enter a country, it can lead to increased competition for domestic producers. This competition can harm domestic producers as they may struggle to compete with the lower prices or higher quality of the imported goods. This can result in a loss of market share, reduced profits, and potentially even job losses for domestic producers.