Quiz On Social Stratification! Trivia

The statement is true because doctors, lawyers, and college professors generally have high-paying jobs that allow them to have a comfortable lifestyle. However, it is mentioned that they don't live like Donald Trump, indicating that while they are well-off, they do not have the same level of extreme wealth as someone like Donald Trump.

A police officer who pulls you over can do so on the authority of legitimate power. Legitimate power refers to the authority granted to individuals in certain positions or roles, such as police officers, to enforce laws and maintain order. This authority is derived from the legal system and is recognized by society as valid and justified. Therefore, when a police officer pulls you over, they are exercising their legitimate power to enforce traffic laws and ensure public safety.

Minorities such as African Americans and Latinos have a higher chance of being part of the underclass than do whites. This is because these minority groups often face systemic discrimination, unequal access to resources and opportunities, and higher rates of poverty. Historical factors such as slavery, segregation, and institutional racism have contributed to the socio-economic disparities experienced by these communities. Therefore, it is true that minorities have a higher likelihood of being part of the underclass compared to whites.

Relative poverty and absolute poverty do not have the exact same meaning in the United States. Relative poverty refers to a person's income or resources in relation to the average income or resources of the society they live in. Absolute poverty, on the other hand, refers to a fixed threshold below which individuals or families are considered to be lacking the basic necessities of life. While both concepts relate to poverty, they differ in terms of the measurement and criteria used to define poverty.

The correct answer is wealth. When you add up all the economic resources a person has, such as their savings, home, personal property, etc, you are determining their wealth. Wealth refers to the abundance of valuable resources or possessions that a person or entity owns. It is a measure of the financial well-being and assets of an individual.

The mugger who holds up another person at gunpoint and takes all their money is exercising illegitimate power. This is because the act of robbery and using force to take someone's belongings is illegal and goes against the norms and laws of society. The mugger does not have any legitimate authority or right to take the person's money, making their power illegitimate.

In underdeveloped countries like Somalia, Ethiopia, and Chad, the lack of infrastructure and limited financial resources result in a small upper class and a large lower class. This means that there are only a few wealthy individuals or families who belong to the upper class, while the majority of the population falls into the lower class category, struggling with poverty and limited access to basic needs and services.

Income refers to the amount of money a person receives within a specific time period. It includes wages, salaries, bonuses, and any other form of payment received for work or services rendered. Income is an important measure of a person's financial well-being and is often used to determine their standard of living. It is distinct from wealth, which refers to the total value of a person's assets minus their liabilities. Stratification refers to the division of society into different social classes based on factors such as income, occupation, and education. Prestige refers to the social status or respect that a person or group is accorded by others.

Prestige refers to the respect, honor, and recognition that an individual receives from society. It is a measure of social standing and reputation, indicating a high level of admiration and esteem from others. Prestige is often associated with accomplishments, social status, or a position of authority, and it can be earned through various means such as professional success, educational achievements, or contributions to the community. Having prestige implies that one is highly regarded and valued by others, which can lead to increased opportunities, influence, and social connections.

The correct answer is "live in absolute poverty." This means that people who live in absolute poverty do not earn enough money to cover their basic needs such as food and shelter. Absolute poverty refers to a state of extreme deprivation where individuals struggle to meet their basic survival needs. It is different from relative poverty, which is measured in comparison to the average income of a society. The other options, such as being members of the working class or belonging to the monarchy, do not necessarily imply a lack of financial means to cover basic needs.

The given scenario describes a young woman who is unable to improve her job prospects or continue her education due to the responsibilities of supporting her baby. This situation is indicative of the concept of "feminization of poverty." This term refers to the disproportionate representation of women among the world's poor, often resulting from factors such as limited access to education, employment opportunities, and social support systems. In this case, the woman's lack of skills and time constraints due to motherhood contribute to her inability to escape poverty, highlighting the gendered nature of poverty.

The conflict perspective in sociology states that inequality exists because some people are willing to exploit others. This perspective focuses on the power struggles and conflicts between different social groups, such as the rich and the poor, or the ruling class and the working class. It argues that those in power use their influence to maintain their dominance and exploit those who are less privileged. This perspective highlights the role of social inequality and conflict in shaping society and its structures.

Sondra's move from being a warehouse worker to a bank loan officer after attending night school for five years indicates upward mobility. This means that she has moved to a higher position or job with better opportunities and potentially higher pay. This is an example of vertical upward mobility because she has moved up the job hierarchy, rather than moving to a different job at the same level (horizontal mobility) or moving to a lower position (vertical downward mobility). It is not intergenerational mobility because it does not involve a change in social class between generations.

A high school teacher is likely to have more prestige than wealth. This means that they are likely to be respected and admired for their profession, but may not necessarily have a high income or accumulate a significant amount of wealth.

This scenario illustrates intergenerational mobility, as it describes how the son of a factory worker is able to improve his social and economic status by earning a college education and becoming a physics engineer. Intergenerational mobility refers to the movement or change in social status between different generations within a family. In this case, the son's upward mobility demonstrates the potential for individuals to improve their circumstances and achieve higher social positions than their parents.

A 35 year old white male with a college education is least likely to live in poverty in the US today compared to the other options. This is because having a college education generally leads to better job opportunities and higher earning potential. Additionally, being a white male in the US often comes with certain privileges and advantages that can contribute to a lower likelihood of living in poverty.

The correct answer is that social status is inherited and cannot be changed. In a caste system, one's social status is determined by their birth and is fixed throughout their life. This means that individuals cannot move up or down in the social hierarchy based on their achievements, education, or hard work. The caste system is a rigid social structure that perpetuates inequality and restricts social mobility.

The given statement is false. Most modern industrial societies like the United States and Japan do not have caste systems. Instead, they have social stratification systems where individuals have the opportunity to move up or down the social ladder based on factors such as education, occupation, and wealth. These societies generally promote social mobility and provide opportunities for individuals to improve their social status.

Intergenerational mobility refers to the movement of individuals or families from one social class or occupation to another across different generations. In this scenario, the child of an office clerk has achieved upward mobility by becoming a physician, which indicates a change in social status and occupation between generations. This demonstrates intergenerational mobility as the child has moved to a higher social class and occupation compared to their parent, breaking the cycle of their family's previous occupation.

Each layer of social stratification constitutes a social class means that within each level or layer of social stratification, there is a distinct social class. This suggests that social class is determined by one's position within the social hierarchy, with each level representing a different social class. This explanation implies that social class is closely tied to social stratification and that the two concepts are interconnected.

An open class system refers to a society where individuals have the opportunity to improve their social standing through acquiring skills and working hard. In this system, there are no rigid barriers or restrictions that prevent people from moving from one level of social stratification to a higher level. Unlike a caste system, where social status is determined by birth and is difficult to change, an open class system allows for vertical mobility and provides individuals with the chance to improve their social and economic status through their own efforts. This explanation highlights the key characteristics of an open class system and why it is the correct answer in this context.

Social stratification refers to the division of society into different layers or strata based on the unequal distribution of resources such as wealth, power, and social status. These layers or strata are hierarchical, with some individuals or groups having more resources and higher social standing than others. Social stratification is a fundamental aspect of society, as it shapes individuals' opportunities, privileges, and social mobility. It reflects the unequal distribution of resources and can lead to social inequalities and disparities.

Karl Marx believed that the only thing of value that the proletariat (working class) had was its labor. According to Marx, the working class's labor was the source of wealth and value in society. He argued that the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) exploited the labor of the proletariat by extracting surplus value from it. Marx believed that the working class should collectively own and control the means of production in order to emancipate themselves from exploitation. Therefore, the correct answer is "its labor".

The statement suggests that power and prestige are always linked, implying that if someone has power, they will also have prestige. However, this is not necessarily true. While power can sometimes lead to prestige, it is not a guarantee. Prestige is earned through respect, admiration, and recognition, which can be achieved through various means other than power, such as knowledge, talent, or personal qualities. Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that power always translates into prestige.

The functionalist theory of social stratification suggests that the inequality of social classes helps ensure that the most qualified people fill the most important positions. This means that individuals with the necessary skills, knowledge, and abilities are placed in positions that require those qualities, leading to a more efficient and productive society. The theory argues that social stratification is a necessary and beneficial aspect of society, as it ensures that individuals are placed in roles that best suit their abilities.

The symbolic interactionist perspective of social stratification suggests that children in the US are taught that a person's social class is the result of their talent and effort. This perspective focuses on how individuals interpret and give meaning to social interactions and symbols. It emphasizes that people's beliefs and perceptions shape their behavior and social interactions, including their understanding of social class. According to this perspective, individuals are socialized to believe that social class is determined by one's personal qualities, such as talent and effort, rather than external factors like exploitation or revolution.

Personal possessions such as clothes are not typically considered part of a person's wealth because they are not easily convertible into monetary value. While money in a savings account, a paycheck, and a house can all be quantified and contribute to a person's overall wealth, personal possessions are generally excluded from this calculation.

False consciousness, as described by Karl Marx, refers to the working class's acceptance and belief in the ideas and values perpetuated by the capitalist system, despite these ideas being against their own best interests. It suggests that the working class is unaware of their exploitation and oppression, and instead internalizes the dominant ideology of the ruling class. This acceptance of capitalist ideas prevents the working class from recognizing their own exploitation and taking collective action to challenge and change the system.

Prestige is not limited to any specific social class. People from all social classes can be interested in obtaining prestige.

Vertical mobility refers to the movement of an individual or group from one social class or position to another that is either higher or lower in the social hierarchy. In this case, Irena is moving from a job as a computer programmer to a job as a web page designer, indicating a change in her occupation and possibly her social status. This shift represents upward movement in the social hierarchy, making it an example of vertical mobility.