Explore the principles of evidence-based dog training in this quiz. Learn to critically evaluate claims, identify reliable sources, and understand why certain methods are advised over others. Essential for enhancing training techniques and ensuring a great client experience.
We only advise methods that have been formally researched and published in the scientific peer-reviewed literature.
We believe that there are always two sides to a story, and evaluate every dog behaviour claim with an open mind.
No bullshit: no argument to ideology, tradition, or authority We can defend our choice of exercise/advice with critical thinking, sound logic and reliable sources of information.
Rate this question:
Homeopathy
Reiki
Massage
Chiropractics
Physiotherapy
Commercial Dog Appeasing Pheromones
Most over the counter herbs (except for Valerian- and St John's Wart-based herbs, among others)
Relaxation exercises
Tellington Touch massages
Anti-vaccination movement
Osteopathy
Rate this question:
We trust claims about dog behaviour with an open mind
We evaluatie the likelihood of a claim about dog behaviour critically.
Rate this question:
We learn to sharpen our bullshit detectors, we learn bullshit red flags.
Even if a claim has lots of red flags, we put a lot of weight in the client's claimed positive results with the intervention.
Rate this question:
We get our information from as broad a spectrum as possible: TV, internet, books, people's experience.
We learn what makes a source of information reliable, and get our information from the most reliable sources available.
Rate this question:
We speak with authority and confidence to the clients: after all, we've checked our facts. The clients don't need to know how we got to our conclusions/advice.
We transparently share our reasoning behind advising for certain interventions. We do not play the "Trust me, I am a professional" card when the client asks questions.
Rate this question:
It protects us from accidentally advising for inefficient interventions, or making untrue claims to the client.
It contributes to our reputation as the provider of serious, well-researched, reliable, information and efficient and intelligeng advice.
It makes us sound like scientists, which is central to our marketing strategy.
Rate this question:
You give an answer, any answer, sounding authoritative and confident, and using scientific and technical jargon. You then check later and correct the next week if you were wrong. It is important that we appear knowledgeable.
You tell the client that it's an interesting point/question, and that you'll research it and get back to them.
Rate this question:
We have no method. We have ethical (LIMA), commercial (happy client) and methodological (Evidence-based) guidelines. Having a fixed trademarked methods would be an incentive to resist new evidence.
The OhMyDog method is based on well-established best practices and research, and is therefore reliable and efficient.
Rate this question:
Scientists say that...
Science/research says that...
It is scientifically proven that...
An interesting research paper seems to support the idea that...
Rate this question:
A list of information sources (e.g. the internet, experienced dog owners, etc.), sorted in order of how reliable the information they provide is likely to be.
A list of specific research papers, books and websites, sorted in order of how reliable the information they provide is likely to be.
A list of authors, scientists and professionals, sorted in order of how reliable the information they provide is likely to be. (e.g. Cesar Milan, Jean Donaldson, etc.)
Rate this question:
You tell the client anyway, looking as though you know which research paper is concerned. No one is going to check and it is a good opportunity for OhMyDog to position themselves as an authoritative source of scientific information.
You tell the client that you are not 100% sure about what the exact paper is, but that you've heard about it. Later, you make a genuine effort to find the paper/a reliable summary of it, and you read it
Rate this question:
Logical fallacies
Cognitive biases
Strong opinions
Rate this question:
A way of thinking that relies a lot on mental discipline.
The assumption that we are more correct than we in fact are.
A misleading psychological assumption, an unconscious mental shortcut that leads us to the wrong conclusions
Rate this question:
Rules of logic that we should be aware of to get to the right conclusion.
An error in our logic that leads us to draw incorrect conclusions
Reasoning that appears illogical, but that is in fact logically sound
Rate this question:
Because, if you allow yourself to think like that, then saying this is also reasonable: “My dog saw my mom yesterday. Today he is sick. Therefore seeing my mom made him sick”.
Because many health problems have long incubation times. The dog could have come into contact with the cause weeks ago, and only now be showing the problem today.
Because there are always lots of different causes for a problem, so saying that only one (e.g. vaccination) caused the dog's health problem is not completely correct.
Rate this question:
Correlation
Natural
Energy
Transparent
Evidence-based
Chemical
Rate this question:
Raw food lends significant health benefits and carries no health risk to the consumer
Genetically modified food carries significant health risks to the consumer.
The preventive use of anti-biotics in meat carries demonstrable and significant health risks to the consumer.
Gluten carries significant health risks to the average, healthy consumer.
Pet food products coming from China carry more health risks because of less stringent control laws.
Cheap, supermarket brand pet food is equally nutritionally sound than the major brands
Organic food lends demonstrable and significant health benefits to the consumer
Rate this question:
True
False
Rate this question:
Extraordinary evidence
Ordinary evidence
Rate this question:
Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Complementary and Acupuntural Medicine
Chiropractical and Acupunctural Medicine
Rate this question:
Effect of time: the patient would have gone better anyway. It was the disease course. This is why chronic relapsing/remitting disease patients are particularly drawn to CAM.
Placebo (by proxy) effect: The owner believes to see signs of improvement which aren't there. By virtue of having administered the medication.
The quality time and physical contact aspects of CAM can carry therapeutic benefits (e.g. massage aspects of Tellington Touch), rather than their claimed therapeutic benefits of the CAM rituals.
Because they work. Science doesn't know everything. We must encourage clients to follow their desire to explore alternative solutions if modern veterinary medicine is letting them down.
Because people with a dog suffering from a treatment-resistant disease like some forms of cancer are desperate for a solution and feel that modern medicine let them down. But just because modern treatments can't help you doesn't mean that magic pills work.
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.