Intentional Torts And Defenses

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Potopalex
P
Potopalex
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 156
Questions: 15 | Attempts: 156

SettingsSettingsSettings
Intentional Torts And Defenses - Quiz


intentional torts


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 

    How many intentional torts are there?

    • A.

      5

    • B.

      7

    • C.

      9

    • D.

      3

    • E.

      0

    Correct Answer
    B. 7
    Explanation
    There are seven intentional torts. Intentional torts are wrongful acts that are committed on purpose, with the intent to cause harm or injury to another person. The seven intentional torts are assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, and conversion. Each of these torts involves a different type of intentional harm or interference with another person's rights.

    Rate this question:

  • 2. 

    List the intentional torts:

    Correct Answer
    Assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, trespass to chattel, trespass to land, conversion
    Explanation
    The intentional torts listed are actions that are done with the intention of causing harm or offense to another person. Assault refers to the act of causing apprehension or fear of immediate harm, while battery involves the actual physical contact or harm inflicted on someone. Intentional infliction of emotional distress refers to intentionally causing severe emotional distress through extreme and outrageous behavior. False imprisonment is the unlawful confinement or restraint of a person against their will. Trespass to chattel refers to interfering with someone's personal property without permission, while trespass to land involves entering or remaining on someone's property without consent. Conversion refers to the wrongful taking or using of someone's personal property without permission.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    List the elements of battery

    Correct Answer
    Intent, harmful/offensive bodily contact, causuation
  • 4. 

    List the elements for assault

    Correct Answer
    Intent, immediate harmful/offensive bodily contact, reasonable apprehension, causation
    Explanation
    The elements for assault include intent, immediate harmful/offensive bodily contact, reasonable apprehension, and causation. Intent refers to the intention to cause harm or offense. Immediate harmful/offensive bodily contact means physical contact that is harmful or offensive. Reasonable apprehension means that the victim must have a reasonable fear of imminent harm. Causation means that the defendant's actions must have directly caused the harm or offense.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    List the elements for false imprisonment

    Correct Answer
    Intent, confinement in a bound area, causuation
    Explanation
    The elements for false imprisonment include intent, confinement in a bound area, and causation. Intent refers to the deliberate intention to confine someone against their will. Confinement in a bound area means that the person is physically restrained or restricted from leaving a specific space. Causation is the link between the intent and the actual confinement, showing that the intent directly led to the person's confinement. These elements are necessary to establish a claim of false imprisonment, as they demonstrate the intentional and wrongful restriction of someone's freedom of movement.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    List the elements for emotional distress

    Correct Answer
    Intent, outrageous and extreme behavior, severe emotional damages, causation
    Explanation
    The elements for emotional distress include intent, outrageous and extreme behavior, severe emotional damages, and causation. In order to prove emotional distress, it must be shown that the defendant intended to cause emotional harm, engaged in behavior that was extreme and outrageous, and that this behavior directly caused severe emotional damages to the plaintiff. These elements are necessary to establish a claim for emotional distress and hold the defendant accountable for their actions.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Trespass to Land

    Correct Answer
    Intent, invasion of land, causation
    Explanation
    This answer is correct because trespass to land requires three elements: intent, invasion of land, and causation. Intent means that the person intentionally entered or remained on someone else's land without permission. Invasion of land refers to the physical presence of the person on the land, whether it be through walking, building, or placing objects. Causation means that the person's invasion of the land caused harm or damage to the owner's property. All three elements must be present for a claim of trespass to land.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Trespass to chattel

    Correct Answer
    Intent, interfere with enjoyment or use of property, causation, damages
    Explanation
    The answer includes the elements of trespass to chattel, which is a legal term used to describe the intentional interference with someone's right to use or enjoy their personal property. The first element is intent, meaning that the person must have intended to interfere with the property. The second element is the interference with enjoyment or use of the property, which means that the person's actions must have caused a disruption or harm to the owner's ability to use or enjoy their property. The third element is causation, which means that the person's actions must have directly caused the interference. Lastly, damages are required, meaning that the owner must have suffered some form of harm or loss as a result of the interference.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    List the elements for conversion

    Correct Answer
    Intent, interference with property, serious damages, causation
    Explanation
    The given answer is a repetition of the elements listed in the question. It seems that the question is asking for a list of elements for conversion, and the answer simply repeats those elements without providing any additional information or explanation.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    Which torts does transferred intent apply to?

    Correct Answer
    Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Land, Trespass to Chattel
    Explanation
    Transferred intent is a legal doctrine that applies when a person intends to commit a harmful act against one individual but unintentionally harms another person instead. It allows the legal consequences of the intended act to be transferred to the unintended victim. In this case, transferred intent applies to all the torts mentioned: Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Land, and Trespass to Chattel. This means that if someone intends to commit any of these torts against one person but ends up harming another person instead, the legal consequences can still be imposed on them.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    List the ways consent may be given?

    Correct Answer
    Implied (law, custom, or conduct) or expressed.
    Explanation
    Consent can be given in two ways: implied or expressed. Implied consent is when consent is inferred from the law, custom, or conduct of the individuals involved. It means that although consent was not explicitly given verbally or in writing, it can be assumed based on the circumstances. On the other hand, expressed consent is when consent is clearly and directly communicated, either orally or in writing. This answer accurately lists both ways in which consent can be given.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    Name the invalidating factors of consent

    Correct Answer
    Age, mental state, fraud, out of scope, duress, illegal
    Explanation
    The correct answer lists several factors that can invalidate consent. Age refers to the legal age of consent, where individuals below a certain age may not be able to give informed consent. Mental state refers to situations where a person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of their actions. Fraud occurs when consent is obtained through deception or misrepresentation. Out of scope refers to situations where the consent given is not relevant or applicable to the specific situation. Duress refers to situations where consent is obtained under coercion or threat. Illegal refers to situations where the act being consented to is against the law.

    Rate this question:

  • 13. 

    What are the elements for self defense?

    Correct Answer
    Reasonable belief, reasonable force, immediate threat
    Explanation
    The elements for self-defense include having a reasonable belief that there is an immediate threat to oneself or others, and using reasonable force to protect oneself or others from that threat. This means that in order to claim self-defense, one must genuinely believe that there is a danger, and the force used in response to that danger must be proportionate and reasonable. The presence of all these elements is necessary to justify self-defense in a legal context.

    Rate this question:

  • 14. 

    What are the elements for defense of others?

    Correct Answer
    Reasonable belief, reasonable force, immediate threat,
    Explanation
    The elements for defense of others include reasonable belief, reasonable force, and immediate threat. In order to defend someone else, a person must have a reasonable belief that the other person is in immediate danger. They must also use a reasonable amount of force to protect the other person, without using excessive or unnecessary force. Finally, the threat must be immediate, meaning that there is an imminent danger to the other person that requires immediate action to prevent harm.

    Rate this question:

  • 15. 

    Explain the two types of necessity

    Correct Answer
    Public- taking private property to protect the greater good, not liable for damages Private- taking private property to protect private, liable for damages
    Explanation
    The explanation provided correctly explains the two types of necessity. The first type, public necessity, refers to the act of taking private property to protect the greater good. In this case, the person taking the property is not liable for damages. The second type, private necessity, involves taking private property to protect oneself or one's own interests. However, in this case, the person taking the property is liable for any damages caused.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Apr 30, 2024
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • May 25, 2015
    Quiz Created by
    Potopalex
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.