1.
For young children, losing privileges for short amounts of time can be very effective. One way for this to happen is by using what is called “Time-Out.” Time-Out means time away from all those fun things in a child’s life. It is a way of disciplining your child without raising your hand or your voice. Basically, Time-Out involves having your child sit in one place for a certain amount of time. You can easily see that most kids wouldn’t like Time-Out because they would rather be doing fun things (Burke & Herron, 1996, p. 40).
Correct Answer
B. Time-Out is an effective way of disciplining children.
Explanation
The passage explains that Time-Out is a method of disciplining children by having them sit in one place for a certain amount of time. It states that most kids wouldn't like Time-Out because they would rather be doing fun things. This suggests that Time-Out can be an effective way of disciplining children as it takes away their privileges and activities that they enjoy. Therefore, the correct answer is that Time-Out is an effective way of disciplining children.
2.
Refer to the passage on the first question.
Correct Answer
D. It can be very beneficial for young children to lose privileges for a short amount of time.
Explanation
The passage suggests that young children easily lose privileges and that it can be beneficial for them to lose privileges for a short amount of time. This implies that taking away privileges from young children can serve as a form of discipline or teaching them consequences for their actions. By temporarily losing privileges, young children may learn valuable lessons about responsibility, accountability, and the importance of following rules.
3.
People act the way they are dressed. Those wearing beach clothes often put their feet on the desk, slouch in their chair, and look lazy. Those who look professional and businesslike work better and are better received by their colleagues (Casperson, 1999, p. 33).
Correct Answer
C. People act the way they are dressed.
Explanation
The given correct answer suggests that people's behavior is influenced by the way they dress. According to the explanation provided, those who dress in beach clothes tend to exhibit lazy behavior, while those who dress professionally are more productive and well-received by their colleagues. Therefore, the way people dress can have an impact on their actions and how they are perceived by others.
4.
Refer to the passage on the third question.
Correct Answer
A. What people wear has an effect on them.
Explanation
The passage suggests that what people wear has an effect on them. It implies that people who are effective don't wear fancy clothes, while people who are lazy tend to wear the same clothes. This implies that the way people dress can influence their behavior or attitude.
5.
A growing number of individuals from corporate offices to coffee shops are finding romance in the workplace. Today’s emphasis on teamwork and longer work hours make the work environment an opportunity for personal relationships. Today’s busy, almost frantic, and often stressful lifestyle does not allow much free time for meeting interesting people outside the office. With a huge portion of our lives devoted to business meetings and associated activities, the likelihood of meeting someone we might wish to date is highly possible (Casperson, 1999, 147).
Correct Answer
C. Romance at the workplace occurs more often.
Explanation
The passage explains that due to factors such as longer work hours and the lack of free time outside of work, individuals are more likely to find romance in the workplace. The passage suggests that the work environment provides opportunities for personal relationships, indicating that romance at the workplace occurs more often.
6.
Refer to the passage on the fifth question.
Correct Answer
A. Today's busy life has made it hard to find interesting people outside.
Explanation
The passage states that today's busy life has made it difficult to find interesting people outside. This implies that busy people are finding it hard to come across interesting individuals. Additionally, the passage suggests that people who do find interesting people are usually busy with a lot of work. Therefore, the correct answer is that both statement A (Today's busy life has made it hard to find interesting people outside) and statement C (People who find interesting people are usually busy with a lot of work) are true.
7.
Proper etiquette indicates that a thank you note should be sent immediately after the interview. Acknowledge the interviewer’s time and the information you gained about the company during the interview, and express your interest in working with the company. Even if you have concluded that the job or corporation is not a good match for you or your skills, send the thank you. Your graciousness will be remembered (Casperson, 1999, p. 126).
Correct Answer
D. Always send a thank-you note after a job interview.
Explanation
Sending a thank-you note after a job interview is a proper etiquette that should be followed regardless of whether the applicant thinks they will get the job or not. It is a way to acknowledge the interviewer's time and express gratitude for the opportunity to interview. It also shows professionalism and interest in the company. While sending a thank-you note does not guarantee getting the job, it leaves a positive impression and increases the chances of being remembered by the interviewer. Therefore, it is always recommended to send a thank-you note after a job interview.
8.
Refer to the passage on the seventh question.
Correct Answer
C. Sending a thank-you note after the interview is a sign of proper etiquette.
Explanation
The passage states that sending a thank-you note after an interview is a sign of proper etiquette. This means that it is considered polite and respectful to send a thank-you note in this situation. The answer suggests that sending a thank-you note is a sign of proper etiquette, which aligns with the information provided in the passage.
9.
One problem with negative consequences is that parents can lose sight of when to stop giving them. If one consequence doesn't work, parents often try another that is harsher. They begin piling negative consequences on top of negative consequences. This can lead to an upward spiral where the parent ends up grounding the child for the next five years or something outlandish like that. This often happens when parents are frustrated and upset. Children know which "buttons" to push, and parents can quickly lose their patience. That's when "the snowball effect" usually takes place. For example, Amy's dad asked her to clean her room. She didn't do the chore, so her dad took away her telephone privileges for the weekend. Her room was messy the next day. For this, she lost a week of TV privileges. The room didn't get any cleaner, and her father got madder and more frustrated (Burke & Herron, 1996, p.45).
Correct Answer
C. The "snowball effect" of negative consequences is not an effective method of discipline.
Explanation
The passage explains that piling negative consequences on top of each other can lead to an upward spiral of harsher punishments, which is ineffective in disciplining children. The example of Amy's dad taking away her telephone privileges and then her TV privileges shows that this approach did not result in the desired outcome of a cleaner room. Additionally, the passage mentions that parents can quickly lose their patience when children frustrate them, further emphasizing the ineffectiveness of the "snowball effect" of negative consequences.
10.
Refer to the passage on the ninth question.
Correct Answer
B. Making punishments harsher to discipline the child is not a good way.
Explanation
The passage states that making punishments harsher to discipline a child is not a good way. This implies that harsh punishments are not effective in disciplining a child. The passage also suggests that punishments only hold meaning when they are harsher than previous ones. Therefore, the correct answer is that making punishments harsher is not a good method of discipline.