1.
According to Wittgenstein, what ought we to do with the essence of language?
Correct Answer
A. Understand the organization of our language in order to fully express logical concepts.
Explanation
Wittgenstein believed that in order to fully express logical concepts, it is necessary to understand the organization of our language. By understanding how language is structured and how words and symbols are used, we can effectively convey logical ideas and arguments. This understanding allows us to communicate clearly and accurately, avoiding misunderstandings and confusion. It also helps us to analyze and evaluate the logical coherence of different languages and determine which language is the most expressive and logical choice.
2.
What is Wittgenstein’s solution to the problem of how to limit thought through language?
Correct Answer
A. To work out what can be said and rule the rest out as nonsense
Explanation
Wittgenstein's solution to the problem of how to limit thought through language is to work out what can be said and rule the rest out as nonsense. This means that he suggests determining the boundaries of meaningful language by identifying what can be expressed coherently and intelligibly, and dismissing anything that falls outside of those boundaries as nonsensical. By doing so, Wittgenstein aims to establish clear and meaningful communication while disregarding any form of expression that lacks logical sense or coherence.
3.
According to the early Wittgenstein, what contains value?
Correct Answer
D. Nothing in the world
Explanation
According to the early Wittgenstein, nothing in the world contains value. This suggests that value is not inherent in any object or concept, but rather is a subjective interpretation or imposition made by individuals. In other words, value is not a property that can be found in the world itself, but rather is a product of human perception and evaluation. This view aligns with Wittgenstein's broader philosophical framework, which emphasizes the importance of language and its role in shaping our understanding of the world.
4.
Unlike many previous philosophers, Wittgenstein was not interested in solving philosophical problems. Instead, he:
Correct Answer
C. Explained how we can successfully put such problems behind us and focus on other things.
Explanation
Wittgenstein's approach to philosophy was different from previous philosophers. He believed that instead of trying to solve philosophical problems, we should learn to "get over them" and shift our focus to other aspects of life. He explained how we can successfully put these problems behind us and direct our attention towards more concrete everyday problems.
5.
If the Western philosophical tradition is considered to be a quest for objective certainty that guarantees the truth of knowledge, then if Wittgenstein is right:
Correct Answer
D. pHilosopHy is over.
Explanation
If Wittgenstein is right, it means that he believes that philosophy has reached its endpoint and is no longer necessary. He argues that the problems in philosophy arise from misunderstandings and confusions caused by the misuse of language. According to him, by analyzing and purifying our use of language, philosophical thought can be resolved. Therefore, the correct answer suggests that philosophy is over because its purpose has been fulfilled by Wittgenstein's approach to language analysis.
6.
According to the early Wittgenstein, what is a simple sentence that cannot be broken down further called?
Correct Answer
B. Atomic proposition
Explanation
According to the early Wittgenstein, a simple sentence that cannot be broken down further is called an atomic proposition. This term refers to a proposition that does not contain any logical connectives or other propositions within it. It is considered to be the most basic unit of meaning and cannot be further analyzed or broken down into smaller components.
7.
The early Wittgenstein is suspicious of philosophical theories of knowledge, reality, the self and the external world . . .
Correct Answer
A. Because the language used has no anchor in concrete life
Explanation
The early Wittgenstein is suspicious of philosophical theories of knowledge, reality, the self, and the external world because the language used has no anchor in concrete life. This means that philosophical language often lacks a clear connection to real-world experiences and instead relies on abstract concepts and theories. Wittgenstein believed that language should be rooted in the everyday use and understanding of words, and that philosophical theories often become detached from this practical basis. Therefore, he questioned the usefulness and validity of philosophical theories that lack a connection to concrete life.