The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
In this quiz, answer a series of questions about Swiss clinical psychologist Jean Piaget, German-born American developmental psychologist Erik Erikson and American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg. What do you know about their work? Let’s take a look.
Questions and Answers
1.
Highest order of thinking, can think hypotetically
Explanation Abstract thought refers to the ability to think in a conceptual and theoretical manner, beyond what is directly observable or tangible. It involves thinking about ideas, concepts, and possibilities that are not limited to concrete objects or specific situations. This highest order of thinking allows individuals to consider hypothetical scenarios, imagine alternative outcomes, and engage in creative problem-solving. Abstract thought is essential for complex reasoning, critical thinking, and intellectual growth, as it enables individuals to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information on a deeper level.
Rate this question:
2.
Understanding that objects retain mass even though shape has changed
Explanation Conservation refers to the principle that the total amount of mass or matter in a closed system remains constant, even if the shape or form of objects within the system changes. This means that while the shape of an object may alter, its mass remains the same. This concept is important in various scientific fields, including physics and chemistry, as it helps explain the behavior of matter and the laws governing its interactions. Conservation is a fundamental concept in understanding the behavior of physical systems and is widely applicable across different scientific disciplines.
Rate this question:
3.
Understanding that an object exists even though it is out of sight
Explanation Object permanence refers to the understanding that an object continues to exist even when it is not visible or present. It is a cognitive milestone in a child's development, typically achieved around 8 to 12 months of age. Before acquiring object permanence, infants believe that objects cease to exist when they are out of sight. However, once they develop this understanding, they can search for and remember objects that are no longer visible, demonstrating their grasp of object permanence. This ability is crucial for various cognitive processes, such as memory, problem-solving, and understanding cause and effect relationships.
Rate this question:
4.
Believing that natural events are man made
Explanation Artificialism refers to the belief that natural events are man-made. This perspective assumes that all phenomena in nature are the result of human intervention or influence. It suggests that everything in the natural world has been created or shaped by human actions or intentions. This worldview is in contrast to other explanations that attribute natural events to non-human causes, such as natural forces or divine powers. Artificialism implies a human-centric view of the world, where humans are seen as the primary agents responsible for shaping and controlling nature.
Rate this question:
5.
Inability to undo an action, put it back to original condition
Explanation Irreversibility refers to the inability to undo an action or return it to its original condition. It suggests that once a certain action or process has occurred, it cannot be reversed or undone. This concept is often used in various fields, such as physics, chemistry, and technology, to describe processes or changes that are permanent and cannot be reversed. In the given context, the term "irreversibility" accurately describes the inability to undo an action and put it back to its original condition.
Rate this question:
6.
Giving inanimate objects human qualities
Explanation Animism is a belief system that attributes human-like qualities, such as consciousness and agency, to inanimate objects or natural phenomena. It is the belief that everything in nature, including plants, animals, and even objects, possesses a spiritual essence or soul. This concept is often found in indigenous cultures and ancient religions, where people believe that everything has a spiritual presence and should be respected and revered. Animism is a way of understanding and interacting with the world that acknowledges the interconnectedness and sacredness of all things.
Rate this question:
7.
Ability to focus on more than one aspect of a problem at one time
Explanation Decentration refers to the ability to focus on more than one aspect of a problem at one time. It involves the cognitive skill of considering multiple perspectives or dimensions simultaneously. This ability allows individuals to think beyond a single viewpoint and consider various factors or variables when analyzing a problem or situation. Decentration is an important cognitive process that promotes critical thinking, problem-solving, and flexibility in decision-making. It enables individuals to consider different possibilities, weigh different options, and make more informed and comprehensive judgments.
Rate this question:
8.
Inability to take another's viewpoint
Explanation Egocentrism refers to the inability to take another person's viewpoint into consideration. It is a cognitive bias where individuals tend to only see things from their own perspective and struggle to understand or empathize with others. This can result in difficulties in communication, social interactions, and understanding different perspectives. Egocentrism is often observed in children during their early developmental stages, but it can also persist into adulthood in some individuals.
Rate this question:
9.
Cannot understand the hidden meaning of words and sayings
Explanation Literalism refers to the inability to grasp the underlying or symbolic meaning of words and sayings. It is the tendency to interpret language in a strictly literal sense, without considering any figurative or metaphorical implications. People who exhibit literalism may struggle with understanding idioms, sarcasm, or any form of language that requires interpretation beyond the surface level. They take everything at face value and may have difficulty understanding the intended message or subtext.
Rate this question:
10.
Can only focus on one aspect of a problem at a time.
Explanation Centration refers to the cognitive tendency of children to focus on only one aspect of a problem while disregarding other relevant factors. This means that they are unable to consider multiple perspectives or dimensions simultaneously. This cognitive limitation can lead to errors in problem-solving and decision-making, as they may overlook important information or fail to see the bigger picture. Centration is a characteristic of preoperational thinking, which is typically observed in children aged 2 to 7 years old, according to Piaget's theory of cognitive development.
Rate this question:
11.
Children who are seeking the freedom and opportunity to engage in tasks; want to do things for themselves
Explanation This answer refers to Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. According to Erikson, the stage of autonomy vs. shame/doubt occurs during early childhood (around 1 to 3 years old). At this stage, children are eager to assert their independence and autonomy. They want to do things for themselves, explore their environment, and engage in tasks. If they are allowed to do so and encouraged to be independent, they develop a sense of autonomy. However, if they are overly controlled or criticized for their attempts at independence, they may develop feelings of shame and doubt in their abilities.
Rate this question:
12.
Able to care about another without losing oneself in the process
Explanation Intimacy vs. Isolation is a stage in Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory. During this stage, individuals face the challenge of forming close and meaningful relationships with others while maintaining a sense of personal identity. The ability to care about another without losing oneself in the process is a characteristic of successful resolution of this stage. It involves finding a balance between intimacy and independence, allowing individuals to form deep connections with others while still maintaining their own sense of self. This is crucial for healthy and fulfilling relationships and is an important aspect of adult development.
Rate this question:
13.
Concerned with others beyond immediate family, with future generations, looks at what they have accomplished so far
Explanation Generativity vs. Stagnation is a stage in Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory. During this stage, individuals are concerned with making a positive impact on the world and future generations, beyond their immediate family. They reflect on their accomplishments and strive to leave a meaningful legacy. Stagnation, on the other hand, refers to a lack of growth and progress, where individuals feel unproductive and unfulfilled. Therefore, the correct answer suggests that the stage of Generativity vs. Stagnation is related to being concerned with others beyond immediate family, considering future generations, and reflecting on personal accomplishments.
Rate this question:
14.
Some look at life as a series of missed opportunities and now realizes it is too late
Explanation Integrity vs. Despair is a stage in Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory. During this stage, which typically occurs in late adulthood, individuals reflect on their lives and assess whether they have lived with integrity or if they feel a sense of despair. Those who view life as a series of missed opportunities and now believe it is too late may experience a sense of despair, feeling regretful and unfulfilled. This suggests that the individual may be struggling with the concept of integrity, questioning their choices and the overall meaning of their life.
Rate this question:
15.
When one tries to find out where they fit into the world, that is, who they are
Explanation Identity vs. Role Confusion is a stage in Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory. During adolescence, individuals go through this stage where they explore and develop their own sense of self and identity. They try to understand their place in the world and establish their own values, beliefs, and goals. Role confusion occurs when individuals are unable to form a clear and consistent identity, leading to uncertainty and confusion about their roles and future. This stage is crucial for individuals to establish a strong sense of self and develop a clear identity.
Rate this question:
16.
Basic needs have to be met now or child can become suspicious and fearful
Explanation During the stage of trust vs. mistrust, which is the first stage of Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory, infants develop a sense of trust or mistrust based on how their basic needs are met by their caregivers. If a child's basic needs, such as food, warmth, and affection, are consistently met, they develop trust and feel secure in their environment. However, if these needs are not met, the child can become suspicious and fearful, leading to a sense of mistrust. This stage is crucial in forming the foundation for future relationships and overall psychological well-being.
Rate this question:
17.
School-aged, children look at how things are made and how things work
Explanation During the school-aged years, children become more interested in understanding how things are made and how they work. This stage of development, known as industry vs. inferiority, is characterized by a child's desire to be productive and competent. They strive to accomplish tasks and develop skills, seeking recognition and praise for their efforts. If they are successful in their endeavors, they develop a sense of industry and confidence. However, if they experience constant failure or lack of support, they may develop feelings of inferiority and low self-esteem.
Rate this question:
18.
Begins to engage in fantasy play; begin to master their own body
Explanation During the stage of Initiative vs. Guilt, children begin to engage in fantasy play and start to explore and understand their own bodies. This stage, according to Erik Erikson's psychosocial development theory, occurs during early childhood (around ages 3 to 6). Children at this stage develop a sense of initiative as they start to take on new activities and responsibilities, such as pretend play and exploring their physical abilities. If children are encouraged and supported in their initiatives, they develop a sense of purpose and confidence. However, if their efforts are restricted or criticized, they may develop feelings of guilt and a lack of self-confidence.
Rate this question:
19.
Scenario: "No, I would not tell because it is my duty to help my friend in any way I can. If I could loan her the money myself I would do it in a heart beat."
Explanation The given response suggests that the person values their duty and loyalty towards their friend over any external authority. They prioritize helping their friend in any way possible, even if it means going against what an authority figure might expect or require them to do. This indicates a strong inclination towards personal values and relationships rather than blindly following authority.
Rate this question:
20.
Scenario: "Yes, I would tell because I want my boss to think highly of me. What would my boss think if he found out that I knew all along?"
Explanation The given answer suggests that the person would tell the truth because they want their boss to have a positive opinion of them. They believe that if their boss found out they knew something and didn't share it, it would reflect poorly on their character. This indicates a mindset of wanting to please authority figures and maintain a good image in their eyes.
Rate this question:
21.
Scenario: " No, I would not tell. The store makes so much money by overcharging the customers that they will never miss the money that is being taken. They don't mind taking from others, so why should she worry about taking from them? Besides, I will work with her to try to get the money back."
Explanation The given scenario suggests a principles orientation, where the person believes in following a set of ethical principles and values. They refuse to inform anyone about the store's overcharging because they believe that the store doesn't mind taking from others, so there is no need for them to worry about taking from the store. They also express their willingness to work with the person involved to try and retrieve the money. This aligns with the principles orientation, where individuals prioritize ethical principles and fairness in their decision-making.
Rate this question:
22.
Scenario: "Yes, I would tell because if my boss found out I would get fired. As much as I like my friend, I cannot afford to lose my job either."
Explanation The given scenario suggests that the person would tell on their friend because they fear the consequences of their boss finding out. This aligns with a punishment orientation, where the individual prioritizes avoiding negative consequences or punishment over loyalty or personal relationships. They are willing to sacrifice their friendship in order to protect their job and avoid getting fired.
Rate this question:
23.
Scenario: "Yes, I would tell because stealing is wrong. Besides, it ends up costing everybody more money because the store has to raise its prices."
Explanation The given scenario suggests that the person believes in the social contract orientation. This orientation emphasizes the importance of following societal rules and norms, as well as considering the consequences of one's actions on the community as a whole. The individual in the scenario states that they would tell because stealing is wrong and it ultimately leads to increased costs for everyone. This aligns with the principles of the social contract orientation, which prioritizes the well-being and fairness of the community.
Rate this question:
24.
Scenario: "Yes, I would tell because I am one of a few up for a promotion in the near future. If I did tell I would probably end up getting the promotion after all."
Explanation The given scenario suggests that the person is motivated by the potential reward of a promotion and believes that by disclosing certain information, they would increase their chances of getting promoted. This reflects a naive reward orientation, where the individual is primarily focused on personal gain and may not consider the potential consequences or ethical implications of their actions.
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.