How Much Do You Have The Knowledge Of Website?

Explanation
Objectivity is the only test among the options provided that directly addresses the presence of bias in a research source. Objectivity refers to the absence of personal opinions, emotions, or biases in the information presented. A research source that is objective presents information in a fair, unbiased manner, without favoring any particular viewpoint. By evaluating the objectivity of a research source, one can determine if it is influenced by bias, making it a crucial test for detecting bias.

Explanation
Knowing the author of a web site will help you establish its authority. When you know who has created the content, you can assess their expertise, credibility, and qualifications in the subject matter. This information is crucial in determining whether the website can be trusted as a reliable source of information. By considering the author's credentials and reputation, you can evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the content presented on the website.

Explanation
The statement suggests that it is acceptable to use a biased site, which is incorrect. It is important to avoid using biased sources of information as they can present a one-sided or distorted view of a topic. Using biased sources can lead to misinformation and a lack of objectivity in understanding a subject. Therefore, the correct answer is False.

Explanation
Typographic errors on a site can help you determine its accuracy. Typographical errors often indicate a lack of attention to detail and can suggest that the information on the site may not be reliable or trustworthy. Errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation can also affect the clarity and understanding of the content, potentially leading to misinformation or misinterpretation. Therefore, identifying typographical errors can be a useful indicator of the accuracy and reliability of the information presented on a website.

Explanation
Finding phone numbers, addresses, or other contact information can help establish a site's authority. This is because having accurate and up-to-date contact information shows that the website is legitimate and trustworthy. It indicates that the site is actively maintained and allows users to easily reach out for any queries or concerns. This enhances the site's credibility and establishes it as an authoritative source of information or services.

Explanation
When information is posted on a commercial website that supports a product, it is likely to be biased and lack objectivity. The purpose of such websites is to promote and sell the product, so the information provided may be exaggerated or selectively presented to favor the product. Therefore, it is reasonable to doubt the objectivity of the information presented on a commercial website supporting a product.

Explanation
A web site that contains a very brief entry on a topic might be weak in coverage because it implies that the information provided is limited and does not provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. A lack of coverage means that important aspects or details of the topic may be missing, leading to a shallow or incomplete understanding for the users.

Explanation
The given answer is false because "primary sources" refer to original documents or artifacts that provide direct evidence or firsthand accounts of an event or topic. These sources are created at the time of the event or by individuals who directly witnessed or participated in it. They are not limited to what appears first in a Google search, as search results can be influenced by various factors such as popularity, relevance, and search algorithms.

Explanation
Wikipedia can be a valuable resource for research as it provides a vast amount of information on various topics. While it is true that anyone can edit Wikipedia articles, the platform has strict guidelines and a community of editors who constantly monitor and update the content for accuracy. Additionally, Wikipedia articles often provide references and citations that can be used to verify information. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that Wikipedia should not be used for research.

Explanation
This statement is false because even if a site has been removed by its creators, it can still be accessed through cached versions or archived copies available on the internet. Additionally, there are various tools and methods that can be used to recover or access deleted websites. Therefore, the removal of a site by its creators does not guarantee that it cannot be accessed anymore.